Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27167981›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluation of a Gender Equity and Family Planning Intervention for Married Men and Couples in Rural India.

Anita Raj, Mohan Ghule, Julie Ritter, Madhusudana Battala, Velhal Gajanan, Saritha Nair, Anindita Dasgupta, Jay G Silverman, Donta Balaiah, Niranjan Saggurti

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01593943 phase3completednot on this map

Gender Equity-Focused, Male-Centered Family Planning for Rural India

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2012 to 2014Enrolled2,162ConditionsFamily PlanningArmsCHARM
NCT03514914 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Enhancing Male Participation in Interventions to Prevent Unintended Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2018 to 2020Enrolled2,402ConditionsContraceptionArmsThe CHARM2 Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Theory-based interventions for contraception.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anita RajCenter on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
Mohan GhuleNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (NIRRH), Mumbai, India.
Julie RitterCenter on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
Madhusudana BattalaPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.
Velhal GajananT N Medical College & B Y L Nair Ch Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Saritha NairNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (NIRRH), Mumbai, India.
Anindita DasguptaCenter on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
Jay G SilvermanCenter on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Global Public Health, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
Donta BalaiahNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (NIRRH), Mumbai, India.
Niranjan SaggurtiPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.
National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health · INCenter for Health and Gender Equity · USPopulation Council Institute · INUniversity of California, San Diego · USTopiwala National Medical College & BYL Nair Charitable Hospital · IN

Funding

Gender Equity-Focused, Male-Centered Family Planning for Rural IndiaR01HD061115 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BATTALA, MADHUSUDANA, RAJ, ANITA · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
ESTIMA: Empowerment of Sex workers To Increase Social and Economic MobilityK01MH099969 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI REED, ELIZABETH ANN · 2014 to 2017
$729k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061115NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH099969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite ongoing recommendations to increase male engagement and gender-equity (GE) counseling in family planning (FP) services, few such programs have been implemented and rigorously evaluated. This study evaluates the impact of CHARM, a three-session GE+FP counseling intervention delivered by male health care providers to married men, alone (sessions 1&2) and with their wives (session 3) in India. METHODS AND

findingsA two-armed cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted with young married couples (N = 1081 couples) recruited from 50 geographic clusters (25 clusters randomized to CHARM and a control condition, respectively) in rural Maharashtra, India. Couples were surveyed on demographics, contraceptive behaviors, and intimate partner violence (IPV) attitudes and behaviors at baseline and 9 &18-month follow-ups, with pregnancy testing at baseline and 18-month follow-up. Outcome effects on contraceptive use and incident pregnancy, and secondarily, on contraceptive communication and men's IPV attitudes and behaviors, were assessed using logistic generalized linear mixed models. Most men recruited from CHARM communities (91.3%) received at least one CHARM intervention session; 52.5% received the couple's session with their wife. Findings document that women from the CHARM condition, relative to controls, were more likely to report contraceptive communication at 9-month follow-up (AOR = 1.77, p = 0.04) and modern contraceptive use at 9 and 18-month follow-ups (AORs = 1.57-1.58, p = 0.05), and they were less likely to report sexual IPV at 18-month follow-up (AOR = 0.48, p = 0.01). Men in the CHARM condition were less likely than those in the control clusters to report attitudes accepting of sexual IPV at 9-month (AOR = 0.64, p = 0.03) and 18-month (AOR = 0.51, p = 0.004) follow-up, and attitudes accepting of physical IPV at 18-month follow-up (AOR = 0.64, p = 0.02). No significant effect on pregnancy was seen.

conclusionsFindings demonstrate that men can be engaged in FP programming in rural India, and that such an approach inclusive of GE counseling can improve contraceptive practices and reduce sexual IPV in married couples.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01593943.

Indexed as

Family Planning ServicesMarriageRural PopulationAdultFemaleHumansIndiaMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27167981
PMCPMC4864357
OpenAlexW2374713153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.