Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27167974›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2016

Common and Rare Manifestations of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

Dominique Rosales, Ilya Kister

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Neuroimmunological Implications of AQP4 in Astrocytes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dominique RosalesNYU Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, Department of Neurology, NYU School of Medicine, 240 E 38th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA. nancy.rosales@nyumc.org.
Ilya KisterNYU Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, Department of Neurology, NYU School of Medicine, 240 E 38th St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Multiple Sclerosis Center Of Northeastern New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of a highly specific biomarker of neuromyelitis optica (NMO)-the anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody-has opened new paths to understanding disease pathogenesis and afforded a way to confirm the diagnosis in clinical practice. An important consequence of the discovery is the broadening of the spectrum of syndromes seen in the context of AQP4 autoimmunity. These syndromes have been subsumed under the rubric of NMO spectrum disorder (NMOSD). The current classification recognizes not only optic neuritis and myelitis as core syndromes of NMOSD but also cerebral, diencephalic, brainstem, and area postrema syndromes. These neurologic syndromes are the focus of our review. AQP4 is also expressed in many organs outside of the central nervous system, and this may explain some of the unusual, non-neurologic features that have been occasionally reported in NMOSD. Our review catalogues non-neurologic manifestations seen in NMOSD and concludes with a discussion of frequently associated autoimmune and neoplastic comorbidities of NMOSD.

Indexed as

Aquaporin 4BiomarkersHumansNeuromyelitis OpticaSyndromeAquaporin 4BiomarkersAquaporin-4ComorbiditiesNeuromyelitis opticaOptic neuritisTransverse myelitis

Identifiers

PMID27167974
OpenAlexW2394154772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.