Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27167707›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2016

Detection of somatic BRCA1/2 mutations in ovarian cancer - next-generation sequencing analysis of 100 cases.

Magdalena Koczkowska, Monika Zuk, Adam Gorczynski, Magdalena Ratajska, Marzena Lewandowska, Wojciech Biernat, Janusz Limon, Bartosz Wasag

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Hereditary ovarian cancer.Discover oncology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Thousand Polish Genomes-A Database of Polish Variant Allele Frequencies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The highest frequency ofReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Germline and SomaticFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magdalena KoczkowskaDepartment of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Monika ZukDepartment of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Adam GorczynskiDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Magdalena RatajskaDepartment of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Marzena LewandowskaMolecular Oncology and Genetics Department, Innovative Medical Forum, The Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Wojciech BiernatDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Janusz LimonDepartment of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Bartosz WasagDepartment of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLUniversity of Bydgoszcz · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overall prevalence of germline BRCA1/2 mutations is estimated between 11% and 15% of all ovarian cancers. Individuals with germline BRCA1/2 alterations treated with the PARP1 inhibitors (iPARP1) tend to respond better than patients with wild-type BRCA1/2. Additionally, also somatic BRCA1/2 alterations induce the sensitivity to iPARP1. Therefore, the detection of both germline and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations is required for effective iPARP1 treatment. The aim of this study was to identify the frequency and spectrum of germline and somatic BRCA1/2 alterations in a group of Polish patients with ovarian serous carcinoma. In total, 100 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) ovarian serous carcinoma tissues were enrolled to the study. Mutational analysis of BRCA1/2 genes was performed by using next-generation sequencing. The presence of pathogenic variants was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. In addition, to confirm the germline or somatic status of the mutation, the nonneoplastic tissue was analyzed by bidirectional Sanger sequencing. In total, 27 (28% of patient samples) mutations (20 in BRCA1 and 7 in BRCA2) were identified. For 22 of 27 patients, nonneoplastic cells were available and sequencing revealed the somatic character of two BRCA1 (2/16; 12.5%) and two BRCA2 (2/6; 33%) mutations. Notably, we identified six novel frameshift or nonsense BRCA1/2 mutations. The heterogeneity of the detected mutations confirms the necessity of simultaneous analysis of BRCA1/2 genes in all patients diagnosed with serous ovarian carcinoma. Moreover, the use of tumor tissue for mutational analysis allowed the detection of both somatic and germline BRCA1/2 mutations.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2MutationAdultAgedAllelesAmino Acid SubstitutionBiomarkers, TumorDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenetic HeterogeneityGerm-Line MutationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1BRCA2next-generation sequencingovarian cancerPARP inhibitorssomatic mutation

Identifiers

PMID27167707
PMCPMC4867663
OpenAlexW2389186765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.