Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27167229›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2017

Economies of scale: body mass index and costs of cardiac surgery in Ontario, Canada.

Ana P Johnson, Joel L Parlow, Brian Milne, Marlo Whitehead, Jianfeng Xu, Susan Rohland, Joelle B Thorpe

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana P JohnsonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Joel L ParlowDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada. parlowj@queensu.ca.
Brian MilneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada.
Marlo WhiteheadInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Queen's, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Jianfeng XuInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Queen's, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Susan RohlandInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Queen's, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Joelle B ThorpeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An obesity paradox has been described, whereby obese patients have better health outcomes than normal weight patients in certain clinical situations, including cardiac surgery. However, the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and resource utilization and costs in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is largely unknown. We examined resource utilization and cost data for 53,224 patients undergoing CABG in Ontario, Canada over a 10-year period between 2002 and 2011. Data for costs during hospital admission and for a 1-year follow-up period were derived from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, and analyzed according to pre-defined BMI categories using analysis of variance and multivariate models. BMI independently influenced healthcare costs. Underweight patients had the highest per patient costs ($50,124 ± $36,495), with the next highest costs incurred by morbidly obese ($43,770 ± $31,747) and normal weight patients ($42,564 ± $30,630). Obese and overweight patients had the lowest per patient costs ($40,760 ± $30,664 and $39,960 ± $25,422, respectively). Conversely, at the population level, overweight and obese patients were responsible for the highest total yearly population costs to the healthcare system ($92 million and $50 million, respectively, compared to $4.2 million for underweight patients). This is most likely due to the high proportion of CABG patients falling into the overweight and obese BMI groups. In the future, preoperative risk stratification and preparation based on BMI may assist in reducing surgical costs, and may inform health policy measures aimed at the management of weight extremes in the population.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth Care CostsAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexCoronary Artery BypassDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisObesityOntarioThinnessBody mass indexCardiac surgery outcomesHealthcare costsObesity paradoxPublic health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.