Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27167132›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2016

TargetNet: a web service for predicting potential drug-target interaction profiling via multi-target SAR models.

Zhi-Jiang Yao, Jie Dong, Yu-Jing Che, Min-Feng Zhu, Ming Wen, Ning-Ning Wang, Shan Wang, Ai-Ping Lu, Dong-Sheng Cao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 260 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
260citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

260 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Long-term artificial sweetener exposure increases the risk of atherosclerosis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

200 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhi-Jiang YaoSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, People's Republic of China.
Jie DongSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, People's Republic of China.
Yu-Jing CheSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, People's Republic of China.
Min-Feng ZhuSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, People's Republic of China.
Ming WenCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, People's Republic of China.
Ning-Ning WangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, People's Republic of China.
Shan WangCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, People's Republic of China.
Ai-Ping LuInstitute of Advancing Translational Medicine in Bone and Joint Diseases, School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, SAR, People's Republic of China.
Dong-Sheng CaoSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, People's Republic of China. oriental-cds@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-target interactions (DTIs) are central to current drug discovery processes and public health fields. Analyzing the DTI profiling of the drugs helps to infer drug indications, adverse drug reactions, drug-drug interactions, and drug mode of actions. Therefore, it is of high importance to reliably and fast predict DTI profiling of the drugs on a genome-scale level. Here, we develop the TargetNet server, which can make real-time DTI predictions based only on molecular structures, following the spirit of multi-target SAR methodology. Naïve Bayes models together with various molecular fingerprints were employed to construct prediction models. Ensemble learning from these fingerprints was also provided to improve the prediction ability. When the user submits a molecule, the server will predict the activity of the user's molecule across 623 human proteins by the established high quality SAR model, thus generating a DTI profiling that can be used as a feature vector of chemicals for wide applications. The 623 SAR models related to 623 human proteins were strictly evaluated and validated by several model validation strategies, resulting in the AUC scores of 75-100 %. We applied the generated DTI profiling to successfully predict potential targets, toxicity classification, drug-drug interactions, and drug mode of action, which sufficiently demonstrated the wide application value of the potential DTI profiling. The TargetNet webserver is designed based on the Django framework in Python, and is freely accessible at http://targetnet.scbdd.com .

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryProtein BindingAlgorithmsBayes TheoremDrug InteractionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansInternetModels, TheoreticalPharmaceutical PreparationsProteinsSoftwarePharmaceutical PreparationsProteinsDrug–target interactionMulti-target SARNaïve BayesSAR modelsWeb server

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.