Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27167090›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2016

Opening the Debate on the New Sepsis Definition. Precision Medicine: An Opportunity to Improve Outcomes of Patients with Sepsis.

Carolyn S Calfee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. TR4 worsen urosepsis by regulating GSDMD.European journal of medical research · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Redefining critical illness.Nature medicine · 2022
    Review
  5. Increased gene copy number ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  6. Gut Microbiota Disruption in Septic Shock Patients: A Pilot Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Carolyn S Calfee1 Department of Medicine.

Funding

Molecular Endotypes of ARDS: Identification, Biology, and Differential Response to TherapyR01HL131621 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CALFEE, CAROLYN · 2016 to 2017
$806k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareHumansMedicarePrecision MedicineSepsisUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27167090
PMCPMC5003223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.