ArticleThe patient2016
Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid Prototype.
Article in The patient, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of an in-consult patient decision aid on decisional quality and involvement for patients with severe hip or knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter, cluster randomized controlled trial.Acta orthopaedica · 2026Trial
- Development of a decision aid to help dually enrolled veterans make informed choices on medication sourcing.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Informing the patient of the placebo option: an ethical necessity likely to reduce inappropriate psychotropic prescriptions?Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Deciding on the location for receiving parenteral antimicrobial therapy: development and preliminary testing of a patient decision aid.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Primer on Plain Language Summaries for Advanced Practice Providers With Published Examples and Practical Applications to Practice.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2025Article
- Relational Ethics in the Administration of Healthcare Technology: AI, Automation and Proper Distance.Sociology of health & illness · 2025Article
- Family Involvement During Patient Hospitalisation-Developing and Testing a Clinical Decision Aid.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Article
- Co-Designing a Consult Patient Decision Aid for Continuation Versus Deprescribing Cholinesterase Inhibitors in People Living with Dementia.Drugs & aging · 2024Article
- Article
- "SDM:HOSP"- a generic model for hospital-based implementation of shared decision making.PloS one · 2023Article
- Development of a Patient Decision Aid to Support Shared Decision Making for Patients with Recurrent High-Grade Glioma.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Lessons for deprescribing from a nonessential medication hold policy in US nursing homes.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- Discussing patient preferences for levels of life-sustaining treatment: development and pilot testing of a Danish POLST form.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing a Digital Informed Decision Making Tool in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Article
- Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021Article
- The Shared Decision-Making Process in the Pharmacological Management of Depression.The patient · 2020Review
- Shared decision making when patients consider surgery for lumbar herniated disc: development and test of a patient decision aid.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
- Patient decision aid for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for use in the consultation: a feasibility study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2019Article
- From guideline to practice: New shared decision-making tools for colorectal cancer screening from the American Cancer Society.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2018Article
- The availability and effectiveness of tools supporting shared decision making in metastatic breast cancer care: a review.BMC palliative care · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe purpose of this study was to translate evidence from Cochrane Reviews into a format that can be used to facilitate shared decision making during the consultation, namely patient decision aids.
methodsA systematic development process (a) established a stakeholder committee; (b) developed a prototype according to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards; (c) applied the prototype to a Cochrane Review and used an interview-guided survey to evaluate acceptability/usability; (d) created 12 consult decision aids; and (e) used a Delphi process to reach consensus on considerations for creating a consult decision aid.
resultsThe 1-page prototype includes (a) a title specifying the decision; (b) information on the health condition, options, benefits/harms with probabilities; (c) an explicit values clarification exercise; and (d) questions to screen for decisional conflict. Hyperlinks provide additional information on definitions, probabilities presented graphically, and references. Fourteen Cochrane Consumer Network members and Cochrane Editorial Unit staff participated. Thirteen reported that it would help patient/clinician discussions and were willing to use and/or recommend it. Seven indicated the right amount of information, six not enough, and one too much. Changes to the prototype were more links to definitions, more white space, and details on GRADE evidence ratings. Creating 12 consult decision aids took about 4 h each. We identified ten considerations when selecting Cochrane Reviews for creating consult decision aids.
conclusionsUsing a systematic process, we developed a consult decision aid prototype to be populated with evidence from Cochrane Reviews. It was acceptable and easy to apply. Future studies will evaluate implementation of consult decision aids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.