Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27166670›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology2016

Lethal Prostate Cancer in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial.

Jonathan Shoag, Sameer Mittal, Joshua A Halpern, Douglas Scherr, Jim C Hu, Christopher E Barbieri

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Prostate cancer screening-when to start and how to screen?Translational andrology and urology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan ShoagDepartment of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: jes9171@nyp.org.
Sameer MittalDepartment of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Joshua A HalpernDepartment of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Douglas ScherrDepartment of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Jim C HuDepartment of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Christopher E BarbieriDepartment of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center at Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Cornell University · USNew York Hospital Queens · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

Genomic instability and DNA repair in a distinct molecular class of prostate cancK08CA187417 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI BARBIERI, CHRISTOPHER E · 2014 to 2018
$865k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA187417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial randomized men to usual care or annual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for 6 yr and digital rectal examination for 4 yr. This trial found no difference between the intervention and usual care arms of the study in the primary end point of prostate cancer (PCa)-specific mortality. The PLCO trial results have had a major impact on health policy and the rate of PSA screening in the United States. We analyzed the 13-yr screening and outcomes data from the 151 participants who died of PCa in the screening arm of the trial to better understand how randomization to screening failed to prevent PCa death in these men. We found that of these men, 81 (53.6%) either were never screened as part of the trial or had an initial positive screen. Only 17 (11.3%) of those who died reached year 6 of the trial with a PSA <4.0 ng/ml. The men who died in the screening arm were also older at study entry than the average PLCO participant (66 vs 62 yr; p < 0.001). Our analysis should inform the interpretation of the PLCO trial and provide insight into future trial design.

Indexed as

Digital Rectal ExaminationAgedAge FactorsData Interpretation, StatisticalEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsTime FactorsUnited StatesProstate-Specific AntigenCancer screeningPLCO trialProstate cancerProstate specific antigenPSA

Identifiers

PMID27166670
PMCPMC4909529
OpenAlexW2346802710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.