Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27166242›Full record

Trial reportSleep2016

Comparison of Sleep Disorders between Real and Simulated 3,450-m Altitude.

Raphaël Heinzer, Jonas J Saugy, Thomas Rupp, Nadia Tobback, Raphael Faiss, Nicolas Bourdillon, José Haba Rubio, Grégoire P Millet

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Effects of Extreme Environments on Human Sleep].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raphaël HeinzerCenter for Investigation and Research in Sleep, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jonas J SaugyISSUL, Institute of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thomas RuppSavoie Mont Blanc University, Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Chambery, France.
Nadia TobbackCenter for Investigation and Research in Sleep, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Raphael FaissISSUL, Institute of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas BourdillonISSUL, Institute of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
José Haba RubioCenter for Investigation and Research in Sleep, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Grégoire P MilletISSUL, Institute of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHUniversité Savoie Mont Blanc · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesHypoxia is known to generate sleep-disordered breathing but there is a debate about the pathophysiological responses to two different types of hypoxic exposure: normobaric hypoxia (NH) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH), which have never been directly compared. Our aim was to compare sleep disorders induced by these two types of altitude.

methodsSubjects were exposed to 26 h of simulated (NH) or real altitude (HH) corresponding to 3,450 m and a control condition (NN) in a randomized order. The sleep assessments were performed with nocturnal polysomnography (PSG) and questionnaires. Thirteen healthy trained males subjects volunteered for this study (mean ± SD; age 34 ± 9 y, body weight 76.2 ± 6.8 kg, height 179.7 ± 4.2 cm).

resultsMean nocturnal oxygen saturation was further decreased during HH than in NH (81.2 ± 3.1 versus 83.6 ± 1.9%; P < 0.01) when compared to NN (95.5 ± 0.9%; P < 0.001). Heart rate was higher in HH than in NH (61 ± 10 versus 55 ± 6 bpm; P < 0.05) and NN (48 ± 5 bpm; P < 0.001). Total sleep time was longer in HH than in NH (351 ± 63 versus 317 ± 65 min, P < 0.05), and both were shorter compared to NN (388 ± 50 min, P < 0.05). Breathing frequency did not differ between conditions. Apnea-hypopnea index was higher in HH than in NH (20.5 [15.8-57.4] versus 11.4 [5.0-65.4]; P < 0.01) and NN (8.2 [3.9-8.8]; P < 0.001). Subjective sleep quality was similar between hypoxic conditions but lower than in NN.

conclusionsOur results suggest that HH has a greater effect on nocturnal breathing and sleep structure than NH. In HH, we observed more periodic breathing, which might arise from the lower saturation due to hypobaria, but needs to be confirmed.

Indexed as

AltitudeEnvironment, ControlledRespirationAdultAtmospheric PressureHeart RateHumansHypoxiaMaleOxygenPolysomnographySleepSleep Wake DisordersOxygenhypobaric hypoxianormobaric hypoxiasleep disorders

Identifiers

PMID27166242
PMCPMC4945310
OpenAlexW2351087368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.