Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27166191›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of colonic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: evaluation of a pooled case series.

Fan Feng, Yangzi Tian, Zhen Liu, Guanghui Xu, Shushang Liu, Man Guo, Xiao Lian, Daiming Fan, Hongwei Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Profiling ofCancers · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Impact of Imatinib on Survival and Treatment Trends for Small Bowel and Colorectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fan FengDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yangzi TianDepartment of Dermatology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Zhen LiuDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Guanghui XuDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Shushang LiuDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Man GuoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Xiao LianDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Daiming FanDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Hongwei ZhangDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Xijing Hospital · CNAir Force Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the extremely rare incidence, data about colonic GISTs are limited. Therefore, aim of the present study was to explore clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of colonic GISTs. PATIENTS AND

methodsColonic GISTs cases were obtained from our center and from case report and clinical studies extracted from MEDLINE. Clinicopathological features and survivals were analyzed.

resultsThere were 79 colonic GISTs patients with a female predominance. The median age was 66 years (range 0.17-84). The median tumor size was 5.8 cm (range 0.5-29). The most common location was sigmoid colon (45.8%), followed by transverse colon (19.5%). The majority of colonic GISTs were high risk (70.8%). Mitotic index was correlated with gender (P = 0.002) and tumor size (P = 0.005), and tumor location was correlated with age (P = 0.017). The five year DFS and DSS were 57.4% and 61.6%, respectively. Mitotic index and NIH risk classification were associated with prognosis of colonic GISTs. However, mitotic index was the only independent risk factor. The distribution of tumor size and NIH risk classification were significantly different between colonic and gastric GISTs (both P = 0.000). The DFS and DSS of colonic GISTs were significantly lower than that of gastric GISTs (P = 0.012 and P = 0.002, respectively).

conclusionsThe most common location for colonic GISTs was sigmoid colon. Most tumors were high risk. Mitotic index was the only independent risk factor for prognosis of colonic GISTs. Colonic GISTs differ significantly from gastric GISTs in respect to clinicopathological features. The prognosis of colonic GISTs was worse than that of gastric GISTs.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolColonic NeoplasmsFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrognosiscolonfeaturegastrointestinal stromal tumorprognosis

Identifiers

PMID27166191
PMCPMC5130040
OpenAlexW4251613889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.