ArticleOncotarget2016
Clinicopathological features and prognosis of colonic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: evaluation of a pooled case series.
Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cecal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Mimicking an Appendiceal Inflammatory Mass: Diagnostic Challenges and Surgical Management: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Incidental Discovery of a Sigmoid Colon Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Mimicking Colitis: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Perforated rectosigmoid colon resulting from gastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting with peritonitis: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Colonic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Demonstrate Unique Biological Characteristics: A Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Pooling Multicenter and Literature-Derived Individual Patient Data.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2025Article
- Molecular Profiling ofCancers · 2024Article
- Article
- Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arising in uncommon locations: clinicopathologic features and risk assessment of esophageal, colonic, and appendiceal GISTs.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022Article
- Clinicopathological features and prognosis of colonic and rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A propensity score matching analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- A case of planar-type gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the transverse colon with perforation.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- The Impact of Imatinib on Survival and Treatment Trends for Small Bowel and Colorectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020Article
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Small Intestine: Progress in Diagnosis and Treatment Research.Cancer management and research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to the extremely rare incidence, data about colonic GISTs are limited. Therefore, aim of the present study was to explore clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of colonic GISTs. PATIENTS AND
methodsColonic GISTs cases were obtained from our center and from case report and clinical studies extracted from MEDLINE. Clinicopathological features and survivals were analyzed.
resultsThere were 79 colonic GISTs patients with a female predominance. The median age was 66 years (range 0.17-84). The median tumor size was 5.8 cm (range 0.5-29). The most common location was sigmoid colon (45.8%), followed by transverse colon (19.5%). The majority of colonic GISTs were high risk (70.8%). Mitotic index was correlated with gender (P = 0.002) and tumor size (P = 0.005), and tumor location was correlated with age (P = 0.017). The five year DFS and DSS were 57.4% and 61.6%, respectively. Mitotic index and NIH risk classification were associated with prognosis of colonic GISTs. However, mitotic index was the only independent risk factor. The distribution of tumor size and NIH risk classification were significantly different between colonic and gastric GISTs (both P = 0.000). The DFS and DSS of colonic GISTs were significantly lower than that of gastric GISTs (P = 0.012 and P = 0.002, respectively).
conclusionsThe most common location for colonic GISTs was sigmoid colon. Most tumors were high risk. Mitotic index was the only independent risk factor for prognosis of colonic GISTs. Colonic GISTs differ significantly from gastric GISTs in respect to clinicopathological features. The prognosis of colonic GISTs was worse than that of gastric GISTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.