Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27165693›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2016

A novel histologic grading scheme based on poorly differentiated clusters is applicable to treated rectal cancer and is associated with established histopathological prognosticators.

Michelle Yang, Aseeb Ur Rehman, Chunlai Zuo, Christine E Sheehan, Edward C Lee, Jingmei Lin, Zijin Zhao, Euna Choi, Hwajeong Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle YangDepartment of Pathology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
Aseeb Ur RehmanAnatomic Pathology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.
Chunlai ZuoAnatomic Pathology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.
Christine E SheehanAnatomic Pathology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.
Edward C LeeDepartment of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.
Jingmei LinPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Zijin ZhaoPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Euna ChoiPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Hwajeong LeeAnatomic Pathology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.
Albany Medical Center Hospital · USIndiana University Indianapolis · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conventional histologic grading of colorectal cancer (CRC) is less suited for resected rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Enumeration of poorly differentiated clusters (PDC) is a recently proposed histologic grading scheme. We aimed to apply PDC grading to treated rectal cancer and to test the prognostic significance of this novel approach. Archived hematoxylin and eosin slides of 72 rectal adenocarcinomas resected following neoadjuvant treatment were retrieved. PDC, tumor budding, and tumor regression were assessed. The parameters were correlated with clinicopathological features and survival. PDC was strongly associated with tumor budding, perineural invasion (PNI), metastasis, and low degree of tumor regression. Tumor budding was significantly associated with lymphovascular invasion and PNI, and metastasis. Tumors with a lower degree of regression were more likely to show high pathologic T stage and advanced clinical stage. Local recurrence was associated with poor survival. PDC did not correlate with overall survival. PDC grading is applicable to resected rectal cancer status post neoadjuvant treatment and correlates with established histopathological prognosticators. PDC and tumor budding may represent a histologic spectrum reflective of the same biological significance. Validation and incorporation of these simple histologic grading schemes may strengthen the prognostic power of the histologic parameters that influence the oncologic outcome in treated rectal cancer. Further study to evaluate the significance of PDC as an oncologic prognosticator is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersClinical Decision-MakingDisease ManagementDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingBiomarkersHistologic gradingpoorly differentiated clustersrectal cancertumor buddingtumor regression

Identifiers

PMID27165693
PMCPMC4867664
OpenAlexW2391075418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.