ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2016
Infertility treatment and children's longitudinal growth between birth and 3 years of age.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03106493 (Upstate New York Infant Development Screening Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Upstate New York Infant Development Screening Program
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toddler diet quality: a factor associated with childhood growth?International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
- Heterogeneous offspring growth in spontaneous versus in vitro fertilization pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Infertility treatment and the growth of children from birth to 12 years of age: A national cohort study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Developmental Readiness for Complementary Feeding: Associations with Initiation Before Age 6 Months.The Journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Factors influencing the birth weight of ART-conceived offspring.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
- Fertility treatment and cardio-metabolic risk factors in middle childhood.Reproductive biomedicine online · 2025Article
- Cohort Profile: Upstate KIDS study.International journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Children born to subfertile couples, how are they doing? Evidence from research.Archives of disease in childhood · 2024Review
- Article
- Longitudinal Child Growth Patterns in Twins and Singletons in the Upstate KIDS Cohort.The Journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Growth of twins conceived using assisted reproductive treatments up to 5 years old: a national growth cohort.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Study protocol for a Developmental Epidemiological Study of Children born through Reproductive Technologies (DESCRT).Human reproduction open · 2023Review
- Article
- Age of Juice Introduction and Child Anthropometry at 2-3 and 7-9 Years.The Journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Conception by fertility treatment and offspring deoxyribonucleic acid methylation.Fertility and sterility · 2021Article
- Alteration of Genomic Imprinting after Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Long-Term Health.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Association Between Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Singleton Pregnancies After Assisted Reproductive Technology.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
- Gestational Cytokines and the Developmental Expression of Obesity in Childhood.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2020Article
- Increased blood pressure and impaired endothelial function after accelerated growth in IVF/ICSI children.Human reproduction open · 2020Article
- Prenatal and early life exposures to ambient air pollution and development.Environmental research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
study questionDoes early childhood growth from birth through to 3 years of age differ by mode of conception? SUMMARY ANSWER: Findings suggest early childhood growth was comparable for children irrespective of infertility treatment, but twins conceived with ovulation induction with or without intrauterine insemination (OI/IUI) were slightly smaller than twins conceived without treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Although studies have found that babies conceived with infertility treatment are born lighter and earlier than infants conceived without treatment, little research especially for non-assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments has focused on their continued growth during early childhood. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Upstate KIDS recruited infants born (2008-2010) to resident upstate New York mothers. Infants were sampled based on birth certificate indication of infertility treatment; specifically, for every singleton conceived by infertility treatment, three singletons without infertility treatment were recruited and matched on region of birth. All multiple births irrespective of treatment were also recruited. Children were prospectively followed, returning questionnaires every 4-6 months until 3 years of age. In total, 3905 singletons, 1129 sets of multiples (96% of whom were twins) enrolled into the study. Analyses included 3440 (88%) singletons (969 conceived with treatment; specifically, 433 with ART and 535 with OI/IUI) and 991 (88%) sets of multiples (439 conceived with treatment; specifically 233 with ART and 206 with OI/IUI) with growth data available. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsMothers reported infertility treatment use at baseline and children's height and weight from pediatric visits. Self-reported use of ART was previously verified by linkage with the US Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) database. Mixed linear models with cubic splines accounting for age and age-gender interactions were used to estimate mean differences in growth from birth to 3 years by infertility treatment status and adjusting for maternal age, race, education, private insurance, smoking status during pregnancy, maternal pre-pregnancy and paternal body mass indices (BMI). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Compared with singletons conceived without treatment (n = 2471), singletons conceived by infertility treatment (433 by assisted reproductive technologies (ART), 535 by OI/IUI and 1 unknown specific type) did not differ in growth. Compared with twins not conceived with treatment (n = 1076), twins conceived with OI/IUI (n = 368) weighed slightly less over follow-up (122 g). They were also proportionally smaller for their length (-0.17 weight-for-length z-score units). No differences in mean size over the 3 years were observed for twins conceived by ART, though some evidence of rapid weight gain from birth to 4 months (adjusted OR 1.08; 95% CI: 1.00-1.16) suggestive of catch up growth was observed. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Participants from upstate New York may not be representative of US infants. Although accounted for in statistical analysis, attrition during follow-up may have limited power to detect small differences. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThis study is the first to prospectively track the growth of children conceived with and without infertility treatment in the USA, including a substantial number of twins. Our findings are similar to what was previously observed in the ART literature outside of the states. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: Supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD; contracts #HHSN275201200005C, #HHSN267200700019C). Authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.