ArticleMolecular cancer2016
Identification of selective cytotoxic and synthetic lethal drug responses in triple negative breast cancer cells.
Article in Molecular cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multi-modal meta-analysis of cancer cell line omics profiles identifies ECHDC1 as a novel breast tumor suppressor.Molecular systems biology · 2021Pooled it
- Model-informed prediction of antiviral drug combination synergy from sparse data using complementary mechanistic and pharmacodynamic approaches.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Emerging Targeted and Multimodal Therapeutic Strategies in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- AVN944 Elicits Apoptotic Responses and Impedes Tumorigenic Potential in Ewing's Sarcoma Cells.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Article
- Molecular Basis of Simalikalactone D Sensitivity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Autophagy modulates glioblastoma cell sensitivity to Selinexor-mediated XPO1 inhibition.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the NRF1-proteasome axis as a therapeutic target in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Drug response profiles in patient-derived cancer cells across histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: real-time therapy tailoring for a patient with low-grade serous carcinoma.British journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Fine tuning a logical model of cancer cells to predict drug synergies: combining manual curation and automated parameterization.Frontiers in systems biology · 2023Article
- Quantitative Analysis of Daporinad (FK866) and Its In Vitro and In Vivo Metabolite Identification Using Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Selective drug combination vulnerabilities in STAT3- and TP53-mutant malignant NK cells.Blood advances · 2021Article
- Multiobjective optimization identifies cancer-selective combination therapies.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Leveraging multi-way interactions for systematic prediction of pre-clinical drug combination effects.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Identification of a Triple Drug Combination That Is Synergistically Cytotoxic for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Using a Novel Combination Discovery Approach.SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D · 2020Article
- High-throughput screening reveals higher synergistic effect of MEK inhibitor combinations in colon cancer spheroids.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Low-Dose Vertical Inhibition of the RAF-MEK-ERK Cascade Causes Apoptotic Death of KRAS Mutant Cancers.Cell reports · 2020Article
- SynToxProfiler: An interactive analysis of drug combination synergy, toxicity and efficacy.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- A normalized drug response metric improves accuracy and consistency of anticancer drug sensitivity quantification in cell-based screening.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Systematic mapping of cancer cell target dependencies using high-throughput drug screening in triple-negative breast cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Article
- Identification of novel regulators of STAT3 activity.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTriple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous and aggressive type of cancer that lacks effective targeted therapy. Despite detailed molecular profiling, no targeted therapy has been established. Hence, with the aim of gaining deeper understanding of the functional differences of TNBC subtypes and how that may relate to potential novel therapeutic strategies, we studied comprehensive anticancer-agent responses among a panel of TNBC cell lines.
methodThe responses of 301 approved and investigational oncology compounds were measured in 16 TNBC cell lines applying a functional profiling approach. To go beyond the standard drug viability effect profiling, which has been used in most chemosensitivity studies, we utilized a multiplexed readout for both cell viability and cytotoxicity, allowing us to differentiate between cytostatic and cytotoxic responses.
resultsOur approach revealed that most single-agent anti-cancer compounds that showed activity for the viability readout had no or little cytotoxic effects. Major compound classes that exhibited this type of response included anti-mitotics, mTOR, CDK, and metabolic inhibitors, as well as many agents selectively inhibiting oncogene-activated pathways. However, within the broad viability-acting classes of compounds, there were often subsets of cell lines that responded by cell death, suggesting that these cells are particularly vulnerable to the tested substance. In those cases we could identify differential levels of protein markers associated with cytotoxic responses. For example, PAI-1, MAPK phosphatase and Notch-3 levels associated with cytotoxic responses to mitotic and proteasome inhibitors, suggesting that these might serve as markers of response also in clinical settings. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity readout highlighted selective synergistic and synthetic lethal drug combinations that were missed by the cell viability readouts. For instance, the MEK inhibitor trametinib synergized with PARP inhibitors. Similarly, combination of two non-cytotoxic compounds, the rapamycin analog everolimus and an ATP-competitive mTOR inhibitor dactolisib, showed synthetic lethality in several mTOR-addicted cell lines.
conclusionsTaken together, by studying the combination of cytotoxic and cytostatic drug responses, we identified a deeper spectrum of cellular responses both to single agents and combinations that may be highly relevant for identifying precision medicine approaches in TNBC as well as in other types of cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.