Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27165580›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Clinical outcome of an alternative fotemustine schedule in elderly patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a mono-institutional retrospective study.

Giuseppe Lombardi, Luisa Bellu, Ardi Pambuku, Alessandro Della Puppa, Pasquale Fiduccia, Miriam Farina, Domenico D'Avella, Vittorina Zagonel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Clinical Significance of OFrontiers in neurology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe LombardiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy. giuseppe.lombardi@ioveneto.it.
Luisa BelluDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Ardi PambukuDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Alessandro Della PuppaNeurosurgery Department, Azienda Ospedale Padova, Padua, Italy.
Pasquale FiducciaClinical Trials and Biostatistics Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Miriam FarinaClinical Trials and Biostatistics Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Domenico D'AvellaNeurosurgery Department, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Vittorina ZagonelDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, via Gattamelata 64, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Istituto Oncologico Veneto · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITAzienda Ospedaliera di Padova · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) in elderly patients is unclear. Fotemustine (FTM) is a third-generation nitrosourea showing efficacy in gliomas and it has been used with different schedules in adult patients. We performed, for the first time anywhere, a mono-institutional retrospective study to analyze the clinical outcome of an alternative fotemustine schedule in elderly patients with recurrent GBM. Retrospectively, we analyzed all GBM patients 65 years or older previously treated with the combination of radiation therapy and temozolomide (TMZ), receiving an alternative FTM schedule as second-line treatment at our Oncological Center from October 2011 to October 2014 with an ECOG PS ≤ 2. FTM was administrated at 80 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks for five consecutive administrations (induction phase), and then every 4 weeks at 80 mg/m(2) as maintenance. We enrolled 44 patients, 33 males and 11 females; average age was 70 years. ECOG PS was 0-1 in 80 % of the patients. 38 patients relapsed during temozolomide (TMZ) therapy. MGMT methylation status was analyzed in 34 patients and MGMT was methylated in 53 % of the patients. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from FTM treatment was 4.1 months (95 % CI 3.1-5.2) and 7 months (95 % CI 5.2-8.4), respectively. Patients with MGMT methylated status and patients who relapsed after completing TMZ therapy had a longer PFS and OS from the beginning of FTM. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent grade 3-4 haematological toxicity (9 %). The alternative schedule of FTM may be an active and safe treatment for elderly patients with recurrent glioblastoma, especially patients with methylated MGMT and who relapsed after completing temozolomide therapy.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsDacarbazineDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNitrosourea CompoundsOrganophosphorus CompoundsRecurrenceAntineoplastic AgentsDacarbazineDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesfotemustineMGMT protein, humanNitrosourea CompoundsOrganophosphorus CompoundsTemozolomideTumor Suppressor ProteinsElderlyFotemustineGlioblastomaTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID27165580
OpenAlexW2392764374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.