Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27165560›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2016

Predominance and high antibiotic resistance of the emerging Clostridium difficile genotypes NAPCR1 and NAP9 in a Costa Rican hospital over a 2-year period without outbreaks.

Diana López-Ureña, Carlos Quesada-Gómez, Mónica Montoya-Ramírez, María del Mar Gamboa-Coronado, Teresita Somogyi, César Rodríguez, Evelyn Rodríguez-Cavallini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Clinical and microbial characterization of toxigenicIranian journal of microbiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana López-UreñaLaboratory of Research in Anaerobic Bacteriology and Research Center in Tropical Diseases, University of Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica.
Carlos Quesada-GómezLaboratory of Research in Anaerobic Bacteriology and Research Center in Tropical Diseases, University of Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica.
Mónica Montoya-RamírezLaboratory of Research in Anaerobic Bacteriology and Research Center in Tropical Diseases, University of Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica.
María del Mar Gamboa-CoronadoLaboratory of Research in Anaerobic Bacteriology and Research Center in Tropical Diseases, University of Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica.
Teresita SomogyiLaboratory of Research in Anaerobic Bacteriology and Research Center in Tropical Diseases, University of Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica.
César RodríguezLaboratory of Research in Anaerobic Bacteriology and Research Center in Tropical Diseases, University of Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica.
Evelyn Rodríguez-CavalliniLaboratory of Research in Anaerobic Bacteriology and Research Center in Tropical Diseases, University of Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica.
Universidad de Costa Rica · CR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is the major causative agent of nosocomial antibiotic-associated diarrhea. In a 2009 outbreak of C. difficile-associated diarrhea that was recorded in a major Costa Rican hospital, the hypervirulent NAP1 strain (45%) predominated together with a local genotype variant (NAPCR1, 31%). Both strains were fluoroquinolone-resistant and the NAPCR1 genotype, in addition, was resistant to clindamycin and rifampicin. We now report on the genotypes and antibiotic susceptibilities of 68 C. difficile isolates from a major Costa Rican hospital over a 2-year period without outbreaks. In contrast to our previous findings, no NAP1 strains were detected, and for the first time in a Costa Rican hospital, a significant fraction of the isolates were NAP9 strains (n=14, 21%). The local NAPCR1 genotype remained prevalent (n=18, 26%) and coexisted with 14 strains (21%) of classic hospital NAP types (NAP2, NAP4, and NAP6), eight new genotypes (12%), four environmental strains classified as NAP10 or NAP11 (6%), three strains without NAP designation (4%) and seven non-toxigenic strains (10%). All 68 strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 88% were resistant to clindamycin and 50% were resistant to moxifloxacin and rifampicin. Metronidazole and vancomycin susceptibilities were universal. The NAPCR1 and NAP9 strains, which have been associated with more severe clinical infections, were more resistant to antibiotics than the other strains. Altogether, our results confirm that the epidemiology of C. difficile infection is dynamic and that A(-)B(+) strains from the NAP9 type are on the rise not only in the developed world. Moreover, our results reveal that the local NAPCR1 strains still circulate in the country without causing outbreaks but with equally high antibiotic-resistance rates and levels.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsCommunicable Diseases, EmergingCosta RicaCross InfectionDiarrheaDisease OutbreaksDrug Resistance, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFluoroquinolonesGenotypeHospitalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinFluoroquinolonesMoxifloxacinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID27165560
PMCPMC4893543
OpenAlexW2357750051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.