ArticleNederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde2016
[Improving the quality of stroke care in the Netherlands; registration of quality indicators is a joint responsibility].
Article in Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An article by the International Consortium of Health Outcomes Measurement, with the title 'An international standard set of patient-centered outcome measures after stroke', was published recently in the journal Stroke. In this article we reflect on this paper and its significance for the Netherlands. The authors report on an international consensus conference to establish recommendations for outcome measurement in stroke care. Indicators, measurement moments and measures were proposed, with a strong focus on patient-reported outcomes. The core measure advocated is use of the recently developed Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-Question Short Form (PROMIS SF v1.1 Global Health; or PROMIS-10). We can appreciate this paper as support for current developments towards benchmarking in stroke rehabilitation in the Netherlands; however, we also have concerns about the administrative burden and the proposed time points and measures. Joining forces to strengthen the current efforts to establish benchmarking should be given priority in the Netherlands.
Identifiers
27165463W2367752613What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.