Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27165437›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test for Consumption (AUDIT-C) is more useful than pre-existing laboratory tests for predicting hazardous drinking: a cross-sectional study.

Hideki Fujii, Naoki Nishimoto, Seiko Yamaguchi, Osamu Kurai, Masato Miyano, Wataru Ueda, Hiroko Oba, Tetsuya Aoki, Norifumi Kawada, Kiyotaka Okawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Alcohol Use during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey among Healthcare and Office Workers in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hideki FujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka City Juso Hospital, Nonaka-kita, Yodogawa, Osaka, 532-0034, Japan. fujiirola@yahoo.co.jp.
Naoki NishimotoDepartment of Radiological Technology, Hokkaido University of Science, Maeda, Teine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8585, Japan.
Seiko YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka City Juso Hospital, Nonaka-kita, Yodogawa, Osaka, 532-0034, Japan.
Osamu KuraiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka City Juso Hospital, Nonaka-kita, Yodogawa, Osaka, 532-0034, Japan.
Masato MiyanoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka City Juso Hospital, Nonaka-kita, Yodogawa, Osaka, 532-0034, Japan.
Wataru UedaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka City Juso Hospital, Nonaka-kita, Yodogawa, Osaka, 532-0034, Japan.
Hiroko ObaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka City Juso Hospital, Nonaka-kita, Yodogawa, Osaka, 532-0034, Japan.
Tetsuya AokiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka City Juso Hospital, Nonaka-kita, Yodogawa, Osaka, 532-0034, Japan.
Norifumi KawadaDepartment of Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Abeno, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Kiyotaka OkawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka City Juso Hospital, Nonaka-kita, Yodogawa, Osaka, 532-0034, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is important to screen for alcohol consumption and drinking customs in a standardized manner. The aim of this study was 1) to investigate whether the AUDIT score is useful for predicting hazardous drinking using optimal cutoff scores and 2) to use multivariate analysis to evaluate whether the AUDIT score was more useful than pre-existing laboratory tests for predicting hazardous drinking.

methodsA cross-sectional study using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) was conducted in 334 outpatients who consulted our internal medicine department. The patients completed self-reported questionnaires and underwent a diagnostic interview, physical examination, and laboratory testing.

resultsForty (23 %) male patients reported daily alcohol consumption ≥ 40 g, and 16 (10 %) female patients reported consumption ≥ 20 g. The optimal cutoff values of hazardous drinking were calculated using a 10-fold cross validation, resulting in an optimal AUDIT score cutoff of 8.2, with a sensitivity of 95.5 %, specificity of 87.0 %, false positive rate of 13.0 %, false negative rate of 4.5 %, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97. Multivariate analysis revealed that the most popular short version of the AUDIT consisting solely of its three consumption items (AUDIT-C) and patient sex were significantly associated with hazardous drinking. The aspartate transaminase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) were weakly significant.

conclusionsThis study showed that the AUDIT score and particularly the AUDIT-C score were more useful than the AST/ALT ratio and MCV for predicting hazardous drinking.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcohol-Related DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPredictive Value of TestsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and QuestionnairesAlcohol Use Disorders Identification TestHazardous drinkingScreening

Identifiers

PMID27165437
PMCPMC4862044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.