Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27165296›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

Targeting populations at higher risk for malaria: a survey of national malaria elimination programmes in the Asia Pacific.

Shawn Wen, Kelly E Harvard, Cara Smith Gueye, Sara E Canavati, Arna Chancellor, Be-Nazir Ahmed, John Leaburi, Dysoley Lek, Rinzin Namgay, Asik Surya and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Forest-Going as a Risk Factor for Confirmed Malaria in Champasak Province, Lao PDR: A Case-Control Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prevalence and temporal changes of mutations linked to antimalarial drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in Palawan, Philippines.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Shawn WenGlobal Health Group, University of California, 550 16th St, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Kelly E HarvardGlobal Health Group, University of California, 550 16th St, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. kelly.harvard@ucsf.edu.
Cara Smith GueyeGlobal Health Group, University of California, 550 16th St, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Sara E CanavatiCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Arna ChancellorUniversity of Queensland School of Public Health, Level 1, Public Health Building (887), Herston Rd, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Be-Nazir AhmedDepartment of Microbiology, National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
John LeaburiNational Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Dysoley LekThe National Center For Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Ministry of Health, Corner street 92, Trapaing Svay village, Sankat Phnom Penh Thmey, Khan Sensok, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Rinzin NamgayVector-borne Disease Control Programme, Ministry of Health, Gelephu, Royal Government of Bhutan.
Asik SuryaNational Malaria Control Programme, Directorate General of Disease Control and Environment Health, Ministry of Health, Jakarta, Republic of Indonesia.
Garib D ThakurMonitoring and Evaluation Division, Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Maxine Anne WhittakerCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Roly D GoslingGlobal Health Group, University of California, 550 16th St, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
James Cook University · AUMahidol University · THMinistry of Health · IDMinistry of Health · KHMinistry of Health and Family Welfare · BDMinistry of Health and Population · NPRoyal Government of BhutanUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignificant progress has been made in reducing the malaria burden in the Asia Pacific region, which is aggressively pursuing a 2030 regional elimination goal. Moving from malaria control to elimination requires National Malaria Control Programmes (NMCPs) to target interventions at populations at higher risk, who are often not reached by health services, highly mobile and difficult to test, treat, and track with routine measures, and if undiagnosed, can maintain parasite reservoirs and contribute to ongoing transmission.

methodsA qualitative, free-text questionnaire was developed and disseminated among 17 of the 18 partner countries of the Asia Pacific Malaria Elimination Network (APMEN).

resultsAll 14 countries that responded to the survey identified key populations at higher risk of malaria in their respective countries. Thirteen countries engage in the dissemination of malaria-related Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) materials. Eight countries engage in diagnostic screening, including of mobile and migrant workers, military staff, and/or overseas workers. Ten countries reported distributing or recommending the use of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) among populations at higher risk with fewer countries engaging in other prevention measures such as indoor residual spraying (IRS) (two countries), spatial repellents (four countries), chemoprophylaxis (five countries), and mass drug administration (MDA) (three countries). Though not specifically tailored to populations at higher risk, 11 countries reported using mass blood surveys as a surveillance tool and ten countries map case data. Most NMCPs lack a monitoring and evaluation structure.

conclusionCountries in the Asia Pacific have identified populations at higher risk and targeted interventions to these groups but there is limited information on the effectiveness of these interventions. Platforms like APMEN offer the opportunity for the sharing of protocols and lessons learned related to finding, targeting and successfully clearing malaria from populations at higher risk. The sharing of programme data across borders may further strengthen national and regional efforts to eliminate malaria. This exchange of real-life experience is invaluable to NMCPs when scarce scientific evidence on the topic exists to aid decision-making and can further support NMCPs to develop strategies that will deliver a malaria-free Asia Pacific by 2030.

Indexed as

Disease EradicationRisk FactorsAsiaCommunicable Disease ControlDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMalariaMalePacific IslandsSurveys and QuestionnairesAsia PacificHard-to-reach populationsHigh-risk populationsMalaria eliminationMigrant populationsMobile populationsPopulations at higher risk

Identifiers

PMID27165296
PMCPMC4863339
OpenAlexW2370897621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.