Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27165020›Full record

ArticleAsian-Australasian journal of animal sciences2017

Effects of probiotic supplement (

Thanh Lam Phuoc, Uttra Jamikorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Influence ofOpen veterinary journal · 2026
    Article
  3. Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Article
  4. Dietary Combined Thyme Meal andVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Dietary probiotic supplementation withAnimal biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  7. Nano-Encapsulated Cumin Oil andVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Exploring the probiotic potential of yeast strains isolated from ripe banana and plantain peels: in vitro and in vivo assessment.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Benefits of heat-killedFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Effects of Dietary Supplementation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thanh Lam PhuocDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture and Applied Biology, Can Tho University, Can Tho city, Vietnam.
Uttra JamikornDepartment of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effects of single or/and double strains of probiotic supplement on feed efficiency, growth performance, and microbial population in distal gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of weaning rabbits.

methodsSixty-four weaning (28 days old) New Zealand White rabbits were randomly distributed into four groups with treatments including: basal diet without probiotic supplement (control) or supplemented as follows: 1×10

resultsThere was an increase (p<0.05) in body weight gain for the LA group at 42 d. Rabbits fed BL responsed with a greater growth (p<0.05) and better feed conversion ratio (p<0.05) than those fed with no probiotic. Digestibility coefficients of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, and gross energy were higher (p<0.05) in LA and BL groups than those in the control group. Male rabbits had higher (p<0.05)

conclusionSupplementation of

Indexed as

Bacillus SubtilisLactobacillus AcidophilusProbioticRabbit

Identifiers

PMID27165020
PMCPMC5205607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.