Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27164171›Full record

ArticleErgonomics2017

Macroergonomic factors in the patient work system: examining the context of patients with chronic illness.

Richard J Holden, Rupa S Valdez, Christiane C Schubert, Morgan J Thompson, Ann S Hundt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ergonomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Human factors and ergonomics methods for pharmacy research and clinical practice.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Personal health information management among healthy older adults: Varying needs and approaches.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard J Holdena Department of BioHealth Informatics , Indiana University School of Informatics and Computing , Indianapolis , IN , USA.
Rupa S Valdezb Department of Public Health Sciences , University of Virginia , Charlottesville , VA , USA.
Christiane C Schubertc Department of Medical Education, Department of Social Work & Social Ecology , Loma Linda University , Loma Linda , CA , USA.
Morgan J Thompsond Department of Psychology , The College of William and Mary , Williamsburg , VA , USA.
Ann S Hundte Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement , University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison , WI , USA.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)KL2TR000446 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$2.8M
A Human Factors Approach to Support Older Chronically Ill Patients' Home CareK01AG044439 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI HOLDEN, RICHARD J · 2014 to 2016
$359k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000446NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NIA NIH HHS K01 AG044439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human factors/ergonomics recognises work as embedded in and shaped by levels of social, physical and organisational context. This study investigates the contextual or macroergonomic factors present in the health-related work performed by patients. We performed a secondary content analysis of findings from three studies of the work of chronically ill patients and their informal caregivers. Our resulting consolidated macroergonomic patient work system model identified 17 factors across physical, social and organisational domains and household and community levels. These factors are illustrated with examples from the three studies and discussed as having positive, negative or varying effects on health and health behaviour. We present three brief case studies to illustrate how macroergonomic factors combine across domains and levels to shape performance in expected and unexpected ways. Findings demonstrate not only the importance of context for patients' health-related activities but also specific factors to consider in future research, design and policy efforts. Practitioner Summary: Health-related activities of patients are embedded in and shaped by levels of social, physical and organisational context. This paper combined findings from three studies to specify 17 contextual or macroergonomic factors in home- and community-based work systems of chronically ill patients. These factors have research, design and policy implications.

Indexed as

Self CareWorkAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsthmaChronic DiseaseErgonomicsFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQualitative ResearchYoung AdultHealthcare ergonomicsmacroergonomicsqualitative researchself-caresociotechnical systems

Identifiers

PMID27164171
PMCPMC5639913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.