Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27164092›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

Connecting the Dots: From DNA Damage and Repair to Aging.

Mei-Ren Pan, Kaiyi Li, Shiaw-Yih Lin, Wen-Chun Hung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. DNA Damage and Repair in Pancreatic Cancer-The Latest Findings.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Determination of the damaging effect of IR radiation on DNA by electrochemical methods and investigation of this effect in the presence of chitosan.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mei-Ren PanGraduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsoung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan. mrpan@cc.kmu.edu.tw.
Kaiyi LiThe Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. kli@bcm.edu.
Shiaw-Yih LinDepartment of Systems Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. sylin@mdanderson.org.
Wen-Chun HungNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan 704, Taiwan. hung1228@nhri.org.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian cells evolve a delicate system, the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway, to monitor genomic integrity and to prevent the damage from both endogenous end exogenous insults. Emerging evidence suggests that aberrant DDR and deficient DNA repair are strongly associated with cancer and aging. Our understanding of the core program of DDR has made tremendous progress in the past two decades. However, the long list of the molecules involved in the DDR and DNA repair continues to grow and the roles of the new "dots" are under intensive investigation. Here, we review the connection between DDR and DNA repair and aging and discuss the potential mechanisms by which deficient DNA repair triggers systemic effects to promote physiological or pathological aging.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairAgingAnimalsCellular SenescenceHumansagingDNA damage responsesenescence

Identifiers

PMID27164092
PMCPMC4881511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.