ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
Structural Determinants of Misfolding in Multidomain Proteins.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adjacent domains drive the emergence of misfolded intermediates in the folding pathway of the PDZ4 from MAGI1.BBA advances · 2026Article
- A PDZ tandem repeat folds and unfolds via different pathways.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- GRB2: A dynamic adaptor protein orchestrating cellular signaling in health and disease.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024Review
- Folding and Binding Kinetics of the Tandem of SH2 Domains from SHP2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Nonspecific Amyloid Aggregation of Chicken Smooth-Muscle Titin: In Vitro Investigations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Co-Translational Folding of Multi-Domain Proteins.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Single-molecule optical tweezers reveals folding steps of the domain swapping mechanism of a protein.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Exploring the sequence fitness landscape of a bridge between protein folds.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Hidden kinetic traps in multidomain folding highlight the presence of a misfolded but functionally competent intermediate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Mapping Multiple Distances in a Multidomain Protein for the Identification of Folding Intermediates.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Competition of individual domain folding with inter-domain interaction in WW domain engineered repeat proteins.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2019Article
- Tandem domain swapping: determinants of multidomain protein misfolding.Current opinion in structural biology · 2019Review
- A hybrid, bottom-up, structurally accurate, Go¯-like coarse-grained protein model.The Journal of chemical physics · 2019Article
- TADOSS: computational estimation of tandem domain swap stability.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Spontaneous refolding of the large multidomain protein malate synthase G proceeds through misfolding traps.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2018Article
- Protein folding transition path times from single molecule FRET.Current opinion in structural biology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent single molecule experiments, using either atomic force microscopy (AFM) or Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) have shown that multidomain proteins containing tandem repeats may form stable misfolded structures. Topology-based simulation models have been used successfully to generate models for these structures with domain-swapped features, fully consistent with the available data. However, it is also known that some multidomain protein folds exhibit no evidence for misfolding, even when adjacent domains have identical sequences. Here we pose the question: what factors influence the propensity of a given fold to undergo domain-swapped misfolding? Using a coarse-grained simulation model, we can reproduce the known propensities of multidomain proteins to form domain-swapped misfolds, where data is available. Contrary to what might be naively expected based on the previously described misfolding mechanism, we find that the extent of misfolding is not determined by the relative folding rates or barrier heights for forming the domains present in the initial intermediates leading to folded or misfolded structures. Instead, it appears that the propensity is more closely related to the relative stability of the domains present in folded and misfolded intermediates. We show that these findings can be rationalized if the folded and misfolded domains are part of the same folding funnel, with commitment to one structure or the other occurring only at a relatively late stage of folding. Nonetheless, the results are still fully consistent with the kinetic models previously proposed to explain misfolding, with a specific interpretation of the observed rate coefficients. Finally, we investigate the relation between interdomain linker length and misfolding, and propose a simple alchemical model to predict the propensity for domain-swapped misfolding of multidomain proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.