Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27163256›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Availability and Quality of Size Estimations of Female Sex Workers, Men Who Have Sex with Men, People Who Inject Drugs and Transgender Women in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Keith Sabin, Jinkou Zhao, Jesus Maria Garcia Calleja, Yaou Sheng, Sonia Arias Garcia, Annette Reinisch, Ryuichi Komatsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Availability of HIV surveillance data in key populations in the countries of the World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Region.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keith SabinStrategic Information and Evaluation Department, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jinkou ZhaoTechnical Advice and Partnerships Department, The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jesus Maria Garcia CallejaDepartment of HIV/AIDS, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Yaou ShengTechnical Advice and Partnerships Department, The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sonia Arias GarciaStrategic Information and Evaluation Department, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, Geneva, Switzerland.
Annette ReinischTechnical Advice and Partnerships Department, The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ryuichi KomatsuTechnical Evaluation Reference Group Support Team, The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the availability and quality of population size estimations of female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drug (PWID) and transgender women.

methodsSize estimation data since 2010 were retrieved from global reporting databases, Global Fund grant application documents, and the peer-reviewed and grey literature. Overall quality and availability were assessed against a defined set of criteria, including estimation methods, geographic coverage, and extrapolation approaches. Estimates were compositely categorized into 'nationally adequate', 'nationally inadequate but locally adequate', 'documented but inadequate methods', 'undocumented or untimely' and 'no data.'

findingsOf 140 countries assessed, 41 did not report any estimates since 2010. Among 99 countries with at least one estimate, 38 were categorized as having nationally adequate estimates and 30 as having nationally inadequate but locally adequate estimates. Multiplier, capture-recapture, census and enumeration, and programmatic mapping were the most commonly used methods. Most countries relied on only one estimate for a given population while about half of all reports included national estimates. A variety of approaches were applied to extrapolate from sites-level numbers to national estimates in two-thirds of countries.

conclusionsSize estimates for FSW, MSM, PWID and transgender women are increasingly available but quality varies widely. The different approaches present challenges for data use in design, implementation and evaluation of programs for these populations in half of the countries assessed. Guidance should be further developed to recommend: a) applying multiple estimation methods; b) estimating size for a minimum number of sites; and, c) documenting extrapolation approaches.

Indexed as

Population DensityData AccuracyDatabases, FactualDeveloping CountriesFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansIncomeMalePopulation GroupsResearch DesignSex WorkersSubstance Abuse, IntravenousTransgender Persons

Identifiers

PMID27163256
PMCPMC4862645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.