Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27163178›Full record

ArticleJournal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)2016

Complementary and Integrative Health Practices Among Hispanics Diagnosed with Colorectal Cancer: Utilization and Communication with Physicians.

David S Black, Chun Nok Lam, Nathalie T Nguyen, Ugonna Ihenacho, Jane C Figueiredo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The Translational Research Program in Cancer Differences across Populations.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David S Black1 Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA.
Chun Nok Lam1 Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA.
Nathalie T Nguyen1 Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA.
Ugonna Ihenacho1 Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA.
Jane C Figueiredo1 Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

USC/UCLA Center on Biodemography &Population HealthP30AG017265 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JENNIFER A AILSHIRE, HIRAM BELTRAN-SANCHEZ · 1999 to 2026
$17.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG017265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveComplementary and integrative health (CIH) use among Hispanic adults with colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis is not well documented. Understanding the prevalence and patterns of CIH use among Hispanics offers insights to uncover potential needs for clinical services.

designParticipants were age 21 years or older with a first-time diagnosis of CRC from population-based cancer registries in California. In-person and/or telephone-based interviews were administered to collect data on CIH use. Demographic and clinical diagnosis data were abstracted from medical records. Descriptive statistical and logistic regression was used to analyze the frequencies and associations between selected patient characteristics and CIH use.

resultsAmong 631 Hispanic patients, 40.1% reported ever using CIH. Herbal products/dietary supplements were used most often (35.3%), followed by bodywork (16.5%), mind-body practices (7.8%), and homeopathy (6.7%). About 60% of participants reported CIH use to address specific health conditions; however, most patients did not discuss CIH use with their physicians (76.3%). Women reported higher CIH use than did men (45.1% versus 35.9%; odds ratio, 1.49 [95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.08]; p = 0.02). CIH use did not differ by clinical stage, time since diagnosis, or preferred language.

conclusionsCIH use is prevalent among Hispanic patients with CRC, especially women. Little communication about CIH use occurs between participants and their healthcare providers. Efforts aimed at improving integrative oncology services provide an opportunity to address such gaps in healthcare service.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsCommunicationComplementary TherapiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansIntegrative MedicineMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27163178
PMCPMC4921899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.