Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27163082›Full record

ReviewSICOT-J2015

Hip arthroscopy and osteoarthritis: Where are the limits and indications?

Claudio Mella, Ignacio E Villalón, Álvaro Núñez, Daniel Paccot, Claudio Díaz-Ledezma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SICOT-J, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudio MellaFacultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana de Santiago - Universidad del Desarrollo Santiago Chile.
Ignacio E VillalónFacultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana de Santiago - Universidad del Desarrollo Santiago Chile.
Álvaro NúñezFacultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana de Santiago - Universidad del Desarrollo Santiago Chile.
Daniel PaccotFacultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana de Santiago - Universidad del Desarrollo Santiago Chile.
Claudio Díaz-LedezmaFacultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana de Santiago - Universidad del Desarrollo Santiago Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of hip arthroscopy, as a surgical technique, has increased significantly over the past ten years. The procedure has shown good and excellent results in symptom relief and function improvement for patients with femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) and concurrent chondro-labral lesions. It is also a reliable method to correct the characteristic pathomorphologic alteration of FAI. However, surgical results are less successful among patients with advanced articular damage and secondary hip osteoarthritis. The aim of this article is to present some clinical and imagenological tools to discriminate the good candidates for arthroscopic FAI treatment from those who are not, due to extensive articular damage.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyHipIndicationOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID27163082
PMCPMC4849216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.