Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27163005›Full record

ArticleACS central science2015

Bright Fluorescent Nanotags from Bottlebrush Polymers with DNA-Tipped Bristles.

Munira F Fouz, Kosuke Mukumoto, Saadyah Averick, Olivia Molinar, Brooke M McCartney, Krzysztof Matyjaszewski, Bruce A Armitage, Subha R Das

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS central science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Branched, dendritic, and hyperbranched polymers in liquid biopsy device design.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Functional DNA-Polymer Conjugates.Chemical reviews · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Precision Anisotropic Brush Polymers by Sequence Controlled Chemistry.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Munira F FouzDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Nucleic Acids Science and Technology, Center for Macromolecular Engineering, and Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University , 4400 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Kosuke MukumotoDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Nucleic Acids Science and Technology, Center for Macromolecular Engineering, and Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University , 4400 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Saadyah AverickDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Nucleic Acids Science and Technology, Center for Macromolecular Engineering, and Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University , 4400 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Olivia MolinarDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Nucleic Acids Science and Technology, Center for Macromolecular Engineering, and Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University , 4400 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Brooke M McCartneyDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Nucleic Acids Science and Technology, Center for Macromolecular Engineering, and Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University , 4400 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Krzysztof MatyjaszewskiDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Nucleic Acids Science and Technology, Center for Macromolecular Engineering, and Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University , 4400 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Bruce A ArmitageDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Nucleic Acids Science and Technology, Center for Macromolecular Engineering, and Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University , 4400 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Subha R DasDepartment of Chemistry, Center for Nucleic Acids Science and Technology, Center for Macromolecular Engineering, and Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University , 4400 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Carnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

UCSD/SDSU IRACDAK12GM068524 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TREJO, JOANN · 2003 to 2025
$24.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM068524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bright signal outputs are needed for fluorescence detection of biomolecules at their native expression levels. Increasing the number of labels on a probe often results in crowding-induced self-quenching of chromophores, and maintaining the function of the targeting moiety (e.g., an antibody) is a concern. Here we demonstrate a simple method to accommodate thousands of fluorescent dye molecules on a single antibody probe while avoiding the negative effects of self-quenching. We use a bottlebrush polymer from which extend hundreds of duplex DNA strands that can accommodate hundreds of covalently attached and/or thousands of noncovalently intercalated fluorescent dyes. This polymer-DNA assembly sequesters the intercalated fluorophores against dissociation and can be tethered through DNA hybridization to an IgG antibody. The resulting fluorescent nanotag can detect protein targets in flow cytometry, confocal fluorescence microscopy, and dot blots with an exceptionally bright signal that compares favorably to commercially available antibodies labeled with organic dyes or quantum dots.

Identifiers

PMID27163005
PMCPMC4827471
OpenAlexW2198392677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.