ArticleJournal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2016
Comparison of ondansetron and granisetron for antiemetic prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery patients receiving general anesthesia: a prospective, randomised, and double blind study.
Article in Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison between ondansetron and granisetron in preventing nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi medical journal · 2025Pooled it
- Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of anesthesia · 2025Trial
- Assessment of pre-, peri-, and post-surgical practices for elective colorectal patients in a model 4 hospital in Ireland.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- A case-control study on the clinical characteristics of granisetron-related arrhythmias and the development of a predictive nomogram.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Article
- Propofol + Granisetron vs. Propofol + Metoclopramide in Symptom Management of Acute Migraine Headache; a Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2022Article
- Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Pediatric Patients.Paediatric drugs · 2021Review
- A Comparative Study Between Ondansetron and Gabapentin for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Following Maxillofacial Surgery.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2020Article
- The effect of ondansetron administration 20 minutes prior to spinal anaesthesia on haemodynamic status in patients undergoing elective caesarean section: A comparison between two different doses.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2020Article
- Incidence and risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting in orthognathic surgery: a 10-year retrospective study.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2020Article
- Comparison of Ondansetron and Granisetron Effects for Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Following Strabismus Surgery.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- Article
- Extended release granisetron: Review of pharmacologic considerations and clinical role in the perioperative setting.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the efficacy of intravenous ondansetron (4 mg, 2 mL) and granisetron (2 mg, 2 mL) for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients during oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures under general anesthesia. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective, randomized, and double blind clinical study was carried out with 60 patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures under general anesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups of 30 individuals each. Approximately two minutes before induction of general anesthesia, each patient received either 4 mg (2 mL) ondansetron or 2 mg (2 mL) granisetron intravenously in a double blind manner. Balanced anesthetic technique was used for all patients. Patients were assessed for episodes of nausea, retching, vomiting, and the need for rescue antiemetic at intervals of 0-2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Incidence of complete response and adverse effects were assessed at 24 hours postoperatively. Data was tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis using the chi-square test, unpaired t-test, or the Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsThere was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for incidence of PONV or the need for rescue antiemetic. Both study drugs were well tolerated with minimum adverse effects; the most common adverse effect was headache. The overall incidence of complete response in the granisetron group (86.7%) was significantly higher than the ondansetron group (60.0%).
conclusionGranisetron at an intravenous dose of 2 mg was found to be safe, well tolerated, and more effective by increasing the incidence of complete response compared to 4 mg intravenous ondansetron when used for antiemetic prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery patients receiving general anesthesia. Benefits of granisetron include high receptor specificity and high potency, which make it a valuable alternative to ondansetron.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.