Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27162270›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2016

An rK28-Based Immunoenzymatic Assay for the Diagnosis of Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis in Latin America.

Marta Alicia Lauricella, Cristina Graciela Maidana, Victoria Fragueiro Frias, Carlo M Romagosa, Vanesa Negri, Ruben Benedetti, Angel J Sinagra, Concepcion Luna, Lilian Tartaglino, Susana Laucella and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta Alicia LauricellaInstituto Nacional, de Parasitología "Dr. Mario Fatala Chaben," ANLIS, Buenos Aires, Argentina. mlauri_2000@yahoo.es.
Cristina Graciela MaidanaInstituto Nacional, de Parasitología "Dr. Mario Fatala Chaben," ANLIS, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Victoria Fragueiro FriasInstituto Nacional, de Parasitología "Dr. Mario Fatala Chaben," ANLIS, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carlo M RomagosaSecretaría de Calidad de Vida, Municipalidad de Posadas, Misiones, Argentina.
Vanesa NegriInstituto Nacional, de Parasitología "Dr. Mario Fatala Chaben," ANLIS, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ruben BenedettiInstituto Nacional, de Parasitología "Dr. Mario Fatala Chaben," ANLIS, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Angel J SinagraInstituto Nacional, de Parasitología "Dr. Mario Fatala Chaben," ANLIS, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Concepcion LunaInstituto Nacional, de Parasitología "Dr. Mario Fatala Chaben," ANLIS, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Lilian TartaglinoSecretaría de Calidad de Vida, Municipalidad de Posadas, Misiones, Argentina.
Susana LaucellaInstituto Nacional, de Parasitología "Dr. Mario Fatala Chaben," ANLIS, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Steven G ReedInfectious Disease Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Adelina R RiarteInstituto Nacional, de Parasitología "Dr. Mario Fatala Chaben," ANLIS, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
National University of Misiones · ARInfectious Disease Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct observation of Leishmania parasites in tissue aspirates has shown low sensitivity for the detection of canine visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Therefore in the last quarter century immunoenzymatic tests have been developed to improve diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to develop a fast recombinant K28 antigen, naked-eye qualitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (VL Ql-ELISA) and a quantitative version (VL Qt-ELISA), and to display it in a kit format, whose cutoff value (0.156) was selected as the most adequate one to differentiate reactive from nonreactive samples. Considering 167 cases and 300 controls, sensitivity was 91% for both assays and specificity was 100% and 98.7% in Ql-ELISA and Qt-ELISA, respectively. Positive predictive values were 100% and 97.4% for Ql-ELISA and Qt-ELISA, respectively, and negative predictive values were 95.2% for both ELISAs. Reagent stability, reliability studies, including periodic repetitions and retest of samples, cutoff selection, and comparison of rK28 ELISAs with rK39 immunochromatographic test, were the international criteria that supported the quality in both kits. The performance of both ELISA kits in this work confirmed their validity and emphasized their usefulness for low-to-medium complexity laboratories.

Indexed as

Immunoenzyme TechniquesAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanCase-Control StudiesDog DiseasesDogsLatin AmericaLeishmaniaLeishmaniasis, VisceralReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTrypanosoma cruziAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID27162270
PMCPMC4944717
OpenAlexW2346399106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.