ArticleOccupational medicine (Oxford, England)2016
Do exposure limits for hand-transmitted vibration prevent carpal tunnel syndrome?
Article in Occupational medicine (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAn apparently high frequency of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) among shipyard workers undergoing health surveillance because of exposure to hand-transmitted vibration (HTV) prompted concerns that current regulatory limits on exposure might not protect adequately against the disorder.
aimsTo explore whether within regulatory limits, higher exposures to HTV predispose to CTS.
methodsAs part of a retrospective audit, we compared duration and current intensity of exposure to HTV in cases with new-onset CTS and controls matched for age. Conditional logistic regression was used to quantify associations, which were summarized by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsThere were 23 cases and 55 controls. After adjustment for body mass index and previous diagnosis of diabetes, no clear associations were observed either with duration of exposure to HTV or with current intensity of exposure. Risk was non-significantly elevated in men with ≥30 years' exposure to HTV (OR 1.6), but in the highest category of current exposure [8-h energy-equivalent frequency-weighted acceleration (A8) ≥ 4.0 m/s(2)], risk was lower than that in the reference category (A8 < 2.5 m/s(2)). Moreover, there was a significantly reduced risk of CTS in men with a previous diagnosis of hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.9).
conclusionsWe found no evidence that below the current limit for A(8) of 5 m/s(2), higher exposures to HTV predispose to CTS. However, care should be taken not to overlook the possibility of treatable CTS when workers with diagnosed HAVS present with new or worsening sensory symptoms in the hand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.