Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27161985›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of men's health2018

Predictors of Intention to Obtain Colorectal Cancer Screening Among African American Men in a State Fair Setting.

Charles R Rogers, Patricia Goodson, Lindsey R Dietz, Kola S Okuyemi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of men's health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Masculinity and colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional study of men attending state fairs in Minnesota and Wisconsin.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charles R Rogers1 University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Patricia Goodson2 Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Lindsey R Dietz3 University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kola S Okuyemi1 University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

The Center for Health Disparities Research, Engagement, and Training (CeHDRET)P60MD003422 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI AHLUWALIA, JASJIT SINGH · 2009 to 2013
$6.1M
Training ProgramU54CA153603 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OKUYEMI, KOLAWOLE S · 2010 to 2015
$4.3M
Cancer Related Health Disparities Training ProgramT32CA163184 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MICHELE L ALLEN, Irina Stepanov · 2016 to 2026
$3.4M
Cancer Related Health Disparities Education and Career Development ProgramR25CA163184 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI FORSTER, JEAN, OKUYEMI, KOLAWOLE S · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
Leveraging Best Practices in Mentoring from the Collective Experience of CNPCsP20MD008782 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OKUYEMI, KOLAWOLE S · 2014 to 2014
$230k
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA163184NCI NIH HHS T32 CA163184NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153603NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD008782NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD003422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Racial disparities in health among African American men in the United States are appalling. African American men have the highest mortality and incidence rates from colorectal cancer compared with all other ethnic, racial, and gender groups. Juxtaposed to their white counterparts, African American men have colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates 27% and 52% higher, respectively. Colorectal cancer is a treatable and preventable condition when detected early, yet the intricate factors influencing African American men's intention to screen remain understudied. Employing a nonexperimental, online survey research design at the Minnesota State Fair, the purpose of this study was to explore whether male role norms, knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions influence intention to screen for colorectal cancer among 297 African American men. As hypothesized, these Minnesota men (ages 18 to 65) lacked appropriate colorectal cancer knowledge: only 33% of the sample received a "passing" knowledge score (85% or better). In a logistic regression model, the three factors significantly associated with a higher probability of obtaining colorectal cancer screening were age, perceived barriers, and perceived subjective norms. Findings from this study provide a solid basis for informing health policy and designing health promotion and early-intervention colorectal cancer prevention programs that are responsive to the needs of African American men in Minnesota and beyond.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlack or African AmericanColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansMaleMen's HealthMiddle AgedMinnesotaPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient CompliancePredictive Value of Testscolorectal neoplasmsearly detection of cancermen’s healthminority healthprevention and control

Identifiers

PMID27161985
PMCPMC5101175
OpenAlexW2346520474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.