Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27161564›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for the rapid diagnosis of Ascochyta rabiei L. in chickpeas.

Xiaolu Chen, Lijuan Ma, Song Qiang, Deying Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaolu ChenCollege of Agronomy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of the Pest Monitoring and Safety Control of Crops and Forests of the Universities of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Agricultural University, No. 311 Nongda East Road, 830052, Urumqi, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Lijuan MaCollege of Agronomy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of the Pest Monitoring and Safety Control of Crops and Forests of the Universities of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Agricultural University, No. 311 Nongda East Road, 830052, Urumqi, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Song QiangCollege of Agronomy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of the Pest Monitoring and Safety Control of Crops and Forests of the Universities of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Agricultural University, No. 311 Nongda East Road, 830052, Urumqi, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Deying MaCollege of Agronomy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of the Pest Monitoring and Safety Control of Crops and Forests of the Universities of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Agricultural University, No. 311 Nongda East Road, 830052, Urumqi, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Xinjiang Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ascochyta blight (AB) is a devastating fungal disease of chickpeas that has spread to nearly all of the chickpea cultivating regions of the world. The rapid diagnosis of Ascochyta rabiei L. (A. rabiei), the pathogen that causes AB, plays an important role in A. rabiei epidemic tracking and AB management. In this study, a group of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) primers was designed to detect A. rabiei in chickpea plants and seeds via a LAMP method and a conventional PCR method based on an internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence analysis of A. rabiei. Compared with the conventional PCR method, the LAMP method not only exhibited greater sensitivity and specificity in the detection of A. rabiei but also used simpler equipment and required less operational time. The minimum detectable concentration of the A. rabiei genomic DNA solution with the LAMP method was 6.01 × 10(-6 )ng/μl, which was 100 times lower than that of the conventional PCR method with the same outer primers. The greatest advantage of the LAMP method is that results can be observed via the visualization of color changes in SYBR Green I dye with the naked eye, and it does not require expensive instruments, also with less time consumption.

Indexed as

AscomycotaCicerDNA, FungalDNA PrimersDNA, Ribosomal SpacerNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPlant DiseasesReproducibility of ResultsSeedsDNA, FungalDNA PrimersDNA, Ribosomal Spacer

Identifiers

PMID27161564
PMCPMC4861956
OpenAlexW2418128271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.