Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27161074›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology2016

Metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis on FDG-PET/CT can predict overall survival after (90)Y radioembolization of colorectal liver metastases: A comparison with SUVmax, SUVpeak, and RECIST 1.0.

Waleed Shady, Sirish Kishore, Somali Gavane, Richard K Do, Joseph R Osborne, Gary A Ulaner, Mithat Gonen, Etay Ziv, Franz E Boas, Constantinos T Sofocleous

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Recommendations for the management of yttrium-90 radioembolization in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases: a multidisciplinary review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Advancements and Future Outlook of PET/CT-Guided Interventions.Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The Value ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Clinical Perspectives forMetabolites · 2022
    Review
  15. Dose-Response and Dose-Toxicity Relationships for GlassJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Waleed ShadySection of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Sirish KishoreDepartment of Nuclear medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Somali GavaneDepartment of Nuclear medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Richard K DoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Joseph R OsborneDepartment of Nuclear medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Gary A UlanerDepartment of Nuclear medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Mithat GonenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Etay ZivSection of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Franz E BoasSection of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Constantinos T SofocleousSection of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States. Electronic address: sofoclec@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the performance of 4 metrics of metabolic response on FDG-PET/CT against RECIST 1.0 for determining response and predicting overall survival (OS) following (90)Y resin microspheres radioembolization of colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

methodsWe conducted an IRB-waived retrospective review of our radioembolization database to identify patients with unresectable CLM treated between December 2009 and December 2013. We included patients who had both PET/CT and contrast enhanced CT (CECT) available at baseline and on the first follow-up post-radioembolization. On baseline CECT up to five target tumors were chosen per patient according to RECIST 1.0. Four metrics of FDG-avidity (SUVmax, SUVpeak, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)) on PET/CT were measured for the same target tumors. Using RECIST 1.0, patients were classified as no progression (partial response or stable disease) and progression. For each PET metric, a cut-off point of ≥30% decrease was chosen to define response. OS was calculated from the time of radioembolization using Kaplan-Meier methodology. The log-rank test was used for univariate analysis to identify predictors of OS.

resultsThe study enrolled 49 patients with 119 target tumors; a median of 2 (range: 1-5) tumors were selected per patient. Median OS was 12.7 months (95%CI: 7.2-16.7). Response by MTV (P=0.035) and TLG (P=0.044) reached statistical significance in predicting OS. Response by SUVmax (P=0.21), SUVpeak (P=0.20) or no progression by RECIST 1.0 (P=0.44) did not predict OS.

conclusionMetabolic response based on changes in MTV and TLG can predict OS post-radioembolization of CLM.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrachytherapyColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGlycolysisHumansLiverLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsYttrium RadioisotopesColorectal liver metastasesOverall survivalPET/CTRadioembolizationRECIST 1.0

Identifiers

PMID27161074
PMCPMC5675072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.