Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27160730›Full record

ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2016

[Acute therapeutic measures for limb salvage Part 2 : Debridement, lavage techniques and anti-infectious strategies].

C Willy, M Stichling, M Müller, R Gatzer, A Kramer, D A Back, D Vogt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Management of industrial high-pressure fluid injection injuries (IHPFII): the Water Jetting Association (WJA) experience with water driven injuries.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2019
    Article
  4. [Primary soft tissue management in open fracture].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

C WillyAbteilung Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Septisch-Rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum Rekonstruktion von Defektwunden, Exzellenz-Zentrum zur Versorgung von Verwundeten aus Kriegs- und Krisengebieten, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Berlin, Scharnhorststr. 13, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland. christianwilly@bundeswehr.org.
M StichlingSektion Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie der Abteilung Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Septisch-Rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Berlin, Scharnhorststr. 13, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland.
M MüllerAbteilung I/Laborgruppe Med. Mikrobiologie, Zentrales Institut des Sanitätsdienstes, der Bundeswehr Kiel/Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
R GatzerAbteilung I/Laborgruppe Med. Mikrobiologie, Zentrales Institut des Sanitätsdienstes, der Bundeswehr Kiel/Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
A KramerInstitut für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland.
D A BackAbteilung Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Berlin, Scharnhorststr. 13, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland.
D VogtAbteilung Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Septisch-Rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum Rekonstruktion von Defektwunden, Exzellenz-Zentrum zur Versorgung von Verwundeten aus Kriegs- und Krisengebieten, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Berlin, Scharnhorststr. 13, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of the primary care of Gustilo-Anderson (GA) type IIIB and IIIC extremity injuries is crucial to the success of the limb salvage procedure. This article provides a compilation of consistent, but often controversially discussed aspects of initial debridement, modern techniques of lavage and wound closure, in addition to current issues on the application of antibiotics and antiseptics, based on our own experiences and the latest literature. The following points should be stressed. Severe extremity injuries with gross contamination (GA IIIA, B, and C) will still be associated with an infection rate of up to 60 %. The initial debridement should be performed as soon as an experienced trauma surgeon is available. Tissue that is definitely avital will have to be removed, whereas traumatized but potentially surviving tissue will have to be re-evaluated during a second-look operation after 36-48 h. Given a high enough level of contamination, biofilms will form after as few as 6 h. The perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis has to be initiated early and should be continued for at least 24 h (GA I/II) or up to 5 days (GA III). In cases of bacterial contamination, wound irrigation will be useful with additives such as polyhexanide, octenidine or superoxidized water. Rinsing of the wound should be performed with 3-9 L and only slight manual pressure (no jet lavage). The definitive primary closure of a wound should be achieved in the initial operation, but only in the case of certain "decontamination" and overall vitality of the wound (GA I and II). In the presence of high-grade injuries, a temporary vacuum sealing technique can be used until the earliest possible definitive plastic surgical wound closure.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCombined Modality TherapyDebridementHumansLeg InjuriesNegative-Pressure Wound TherapySalvage TherapySurgical Wound InfectionTherapeutic IrrigationAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsNegative pressure wound therapyOpen fracturesTherapeutic irrigationVacuum instillation therapyWound infection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.