Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27160717›Full record

ReviewHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2016

Cushing's Syndrome: Screening and Diagnosis.

Filippo Ceccato, Marco Boscaro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Filippo CeccatoEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, Padova University Hospital, Via Ospedale Civile, 105, 35128, Padua, Italy. ceccato.filippo@gmail.com.
Marco BoscaroEndocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, Padova University Hospital, Via Ospedale Civile, 105, 35128, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endogenous Cushing's syndrome (CS) is a rare disease, and usually characterized by hypertension, diabetes, obesity, osteoporosis, facial rounding, dorsocervical fat pad, thin skin, purple striae, hirsutism, and mood disorders. Efficient diagnostic and screening strategies lead to the diagnosis of a significantly higher number of cases of CS. As a screening test for CS, the Endocrine Society's Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend a single test with a high diagnostic accuracy, among the 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test (1-mg DST), late night salivary cortisol (LNSC), and 24 h urinary free cortisol (UFC). In normal subjects, administering a higher than physiological dose of glucocorticoids prompts the suppression of cortisol secretion. The 1-mg DST explores this normal feedback reaction from the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA). It is a simple dynamic test, usually performed in outpatients. A morning serum cortisol level <50 nmol/L suffices to exclude CS, unless there is a strong clinical suspicion to suggest otherwise. The HPA axis reaches a nadir just after a person has fallen asleep, but its circadian rhythm is impaired in CS patients, who feature higher cortisol values at night, which are easy to measure in saliva (the LNSC assay). Saliva collection is also suitable for outpatients since cortisol is stable at room temperature and the collection device can be mailed to the laboratory for analysis. UFC levels reflect the integrated tissue exposure to free cortisol over 24 h, and thus provide a particular picture of endogenous hypercortisolism. In most cases, high UFC levels coincide with severe hypercortisolism. UFC is used not only to diagnose CS, but also to monitor its response to medical treatment. All screening tests have procedural snares: some drugs can interfere with the DST; false-positive or false-negative LNSC results may be due to an inadequate soaking of the device or to cyclic CS; and in the case of UFC it is important to ensure that patients provide complete urine collections with appropriate total volumes. Measuring cortisol with antibody-based immunoassays can also generate false-positive results due to cross-reactivity between cortisol, cortisone and other metabolites. Structurally-based assays, such as liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, only measure cortisol and have only recently become available for use in routine clinical practice. This review summarizes the recent literature on the clinical and biochemical aspects of CS diagnostics with a view to helping physicians choose the best screening test for diagnosing endogenous hypercortisolism.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex Function TestsBiomarkersChromatography, LiquidCircadian RhythmCushing SyndromeDexamethasoneHumansHydrocortisonePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk FactorsSalivaSeverity of Illness IndexTandem Mass SpectrometryUp-RegulationBiomarkersDexamethasoneHydrocortisoneCushing’s syndromeDiagnosisLate night salivary cortisolLiquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometryUrinary free cortisol

Identifiers

PMID27160717
OpenAlexW2346455887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.