Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27160659›Full record

ArticleInhalation toxicology2016

Cigarette smoke induced genotoxicity and respiratory tract pathology: evidence to support reduced exposure time and animal numbers in tobacco product testing.

Annette Dalrymple, Patricia Ordoñez, David Thorne, David Walker, Oscar M Camacho, Ansgar Büttner, Debbie Dillon, Clive Meredith

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inhalation toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Refinement in the European Union: A Systematic Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annette Dalrymplea British American Tobacco, R&D , Southampton , Hampshire , UK .
Patricia Ordoñezb Vivotecnia Research S.L., Parque Científico de Madrid , Tres Cantos , Madrid , Spain , and.
David Thornea British American Tobacco, R&D , Southampton , Hampshire , UK .
David Walkera British American Tobacco, R&D , Southampton , Hampshire , UK .
Oscar M Camachoa British American Tobacco, R&D , Southampton , Hampshire , UK .
Ansgar Büttnerc Histovia GmbH , Overath , Germany.
Debbie Dillona British American Tobacco, R&D , Southampton , Hampshire , UK .
Clive Mereditha British American Tobacco, R&D , Southampton , Hampshire , UK .
British American Tobacco (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many laboratories are working to develop in vitro models that will replace in vivo tests, but occasionally there remains a regulatory expectation of some in vivo testing. Historically, cigarettes have been tested in vivo for 90 days. Recently, methods to reduce and refine animal use have been explored. This study investigated the potential of reducing animal cigarette smoke (CS) exposure to 3 or 6 weeks, and the feasibility of separate lung lobes for histopathology or the Comet assay. Rats were exposed to sham air or CS (1 or 2 h) for 3 or 6 weeks. Respiratory tissues were processed for histopathological evaluation, and Alveolar type II cells (AEC II) isolated for the Comet assay. Blood was collected for Pig-a and micronucleus quantification. Histopathological analyses demonstrated exposure effects, which were generally dependent on CS dose (1 or 2 h, 5 days/week). Comet analysis identified that DNA damage increased in AEC II following 3 or 6 weeks CS exposure, and the level at 6 weeks was higher than 3 weeks. Pig-a mutation or micronucleus levels were not increased. In conclusion, this study showed that 3 weeks of CS exposure was sufficient to observe respiratory tract pathology and DNA damage in isolated AEC II. Differences between the 3 and 6 week data imply that DNA damage in the lung is cumulative. Reducing exposure time, plus analyzing separate lung lobes for DNA damage or histopathology, supports a strategy to reduce and refine animal use in tobacco product testing and is aligned to the 3Rs (replacement, reduction and refinement).

Indexed as

AnimalsComet AssayDNA DamageFemaleLungMaleMembrane ProteinsMicronucleus TestsMutationRats, Sprague-DawleyResearch DesignSmokeTobacco ProductsToxicity TestsMembrane Proteinsphosphatidylinositol glycan-class A proteinSmokeCigarette smokecomet assayDNA damageinhalationin vivo

Identifiers

PMID27160659
PMCPMC4898166
OpenAlexW2384600986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.