Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27160439›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Cinema audiences reproducibly vary the chemical composition of air during films, by broadcasting scene specific emissions on breath.

Jonathan Williams, Christof Stönner, Jörg Wicker, Nicolas Krauter, Bettina Derstroff, Efstratios Bourtsoukidis, Thomas Klüpfel, Stefan Kramer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Past, Present, and Future of Human Chemical Communication Research.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emotional expression in human odour.Evolutionary human sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Inner Workings: How human biology and behavior affect indoor air quality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Olfaction scaffolds the developing human from neonate to adolescent and beyond.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Decoding the social volatilome by tracking rapid context-dependent odour change.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Interdisciplinary challenges for elucidating human olfactory attractiveness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Reproducible research into human chemical communication by cues and pheromones: learning from psychology's renaissance.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan WilliamsMax Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany.
Christof StönnerMax Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany.
Jörg WickerJohannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany.
Nicolas KrauterJohannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany.
Bettina DerstroffMax Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany.
Efstratios BourtsoukidisMax Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany.
Thomas KlüpfelMax Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany.
Stefan KramerJohannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human beings continuously emit chemicals into the air by breath and through the skin. In order to determine whether these emissions vary predictably in response to audiovisual stimuli, we have continuously monitored carbon dioxide and over one hundred volatile organic compounds in a cinema. It was found that many airborne chemicals in cinema air varied distinctively and reproducibly with time for a particular film, even in different screenings to different audiences. Application of scene labels and advanced data mining methods revealed that specific film events, namely "suspense" or "comedy" caused audiences to change their emission of specific chemicals. These event-type synchronous, broadcasted human chemosignals open the possibility for objective and non-invasive assessment of a human group response to stimuli by continuous measurement of chemicals in air. Such methods can be applied to research fields such as psychology and biology, and be valuable to industries such as film making and advertising.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorEnvironmental MonitoringRespirationAcetoneAir PollutantsButadienesCarbon DioxideHemiterpenesHumansMotion PicturesPentanesTime FactorsVolatile Organic CompoundsAcetoneAir PollutantsButadienesCarbon DioxideHemiterpenesisoprenePentanesVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID27160439
PMCPMC4862009
OpenAlexW2359327586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.