Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27160425›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2016

The Combination of Scopolamine and Psychostimulants for the Prevention of Severe Motion Sickness.

Li-Li Zhang, Hong-Qi Liu, Xu-Hong Yu, Ying Zhang, Jia-Sheng Tian, Xu-Rui Song, Bing Han, Ai-Jun Liu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antihistamines for motion sickness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Gingerol-Rich Extract Derived fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Motion sickness: an overview.Drugs in context · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Li ZhangDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Hong-Qi LiuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xu-Hong YuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jia-Sheng TianDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xu-Rui SongDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Bing HanDepartment of Pharmacy, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ai-Jun LiuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Second Military Medical University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsSevere motion sickness is a huge obstacle for people conducting precise aviation, marine or emergency service tasks. The combination of scopolamine and d-amphetamine is most effective in preventing severe motion sickness. However, this combination is not included in any present pharmacopoeia due to the abuse liability of d-amphetamine. We wanted to find a combination to replace it for the treatment of severe motion sickness. METHODS AND

resultsWe compared the efficacy of scopolamine, diphenhydramine, and granisetron (representing three classes of drugs) with different doses, and found that scopolamine was the most effective one. We also found scopolamine inhibited central nervous system at therapeutic doses and caused anxiety. Then, we combined it with different doses of psychostimulants (d-amphetamine, modafinil, caffeine) to find the best combination for motion sickness. The efficacy of scopolamine with modafinil (1 + 10 mg/kg) was equivalent to that of scopolamine with d-amphetamine (1 + 1 mg/kg); This combination also excited central nervous system and abolished the anxiety caused by scopolamine.

conclusionsThe optimal dose ratio of scopolamine and modafinil is 1:10. This combination is beneficial for motion sickness and can abolish the side effects of scopolamine. So, it might be a good replacement of scopolamine and d-amphetamine for severe motion sickness.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsBenzhydryl CompoundsCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsCholinergic AntagonistsDextroamphetamineDiphenhydramineDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CombinationsGranisetronLocomotionMaleMiceMice, Inbred ICRBenzhydryl CompoundsCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsCholinergic AntagonistsDextroamphetamineDiphenhydramineDrug CombinationsGranisetronModafinilScopolamineLocomotor ActivityModafinilMotion sicknessScopolamine

Identifiers

PMID27160425
PMCPMC6492890
OpenAlexW2352055287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.