Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27160191›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2016

The native microbiome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: gateway to a new host-microbiome model.

Philipp Dirksen, Sarah Arnaud Marsh, Ines Braker, Nele Heitland, Sophia Wagner, Rania Nakad, Sebastian Mader, Carola Petersen, Vienna Kowallik, Philip Rosenstiel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 240 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
240citing papers in PubMed
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

240 citing papers in PubMed, 463 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gut microbes · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bacterial-derived cyclic lipopeptides suppress dauer arrest inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "Let's Dry up and Survive Together": Is Anhydrobiosis in TwoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. UtilizingPreventive nutrition and food science · 2026
    Review
  16. The bacteria of a fig community.Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

180 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Philipp DirksenDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University, Am Botanischen Garten 3-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Sarah Arnaud MarshInstitute of Biology of the Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), CNRS, Inserm, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230, Paris Cedex 05, France.
Ines BrakerDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University, Am Botanischen Garten 3-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Nele HeitlandDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University, Am Botanischen Garten 3-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Sophia WagnerDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University, Am Botanischen Garten 3-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Rania NakadDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University, Am Botanischen Garten 3-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Sebastian MaderDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University, Am Botanischen Garten 3-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Carola PetersenDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University, Am Botanischen Garten 3-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Vienna KowallikDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University, Am Botanischen Garten 3-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Philip RosenstielInstitute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts University, Am Botanischen Garten 1-3, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
Marie-Anne FélixInstitute of Biology of the Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS), CNRS, Inserm, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230, Paris Cedex 05, France.
Hinrich SchulenburgDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics, Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts University, Am Botanischen Garten 3-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany. hschulenburg@zoologie.uni-kiel.de.
Kiel University · DECologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases · DEInstitut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure · FRInstitut Pasteur · FRMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHost-microbe associations underlie many key processes of host development, immunity, and life history. Yet, none of the current research on the central model species Caenorhabditis elegans considers the worm's natural microbiome. Instead, almost all laboratories exclusively use the canonical strain N2 and derived mutants, maintained through routine bleach sterilization in monoxenic cultures with an E. coli strain as food. Here, we characterize for the first time the native microbiome of C. elegans and assess its influence on nematode life history characteristics.

resultsNematodes sampled directly from their native habitats carry a species-rich bacterial community, dominated by Proteobacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae and members of the genera Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Ochrobactrum, and Sphingomonas. The C. elegans microbiome is distinct from that of the worm's natural environment and the congeneric species C. remanei. Exposure to a derived experimental microbiome revealed that bacterial composition is influenced by host developmental stage and genotype. These experiments also showed that the microbes enhance host fitness under standard and also stressful conditions (e.g., high temperature and either low or high osmolarity). Taking advantage of the nematode's transparency, we further demonstrate that several Proteobacteria are able to enter the C. elegans gut and that an Ochrobactrum isolate even seems to be able to persist in the intestines under stressful conditions. Moreover, three Pseudomonas isolates produce an anti-fungal effect in vitro which we show can contribute to the worm's defense against fungal pathogens in vivo.

conclusionThis first systematic analysis of the nematode's native microbiome reveals a species-rich bacterial community to be associated with C. elegans, which is likely of central importance for our understanding of the worm's biology. The information acquired and the microbial isolates now available for experimental work establishes C. elegans as a tractable model for the in-depth dissection of host-microbiome interactions.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaModels, BiologicalAnimalsAntifungal AgentsCaenorhabditis elegansLife Cycle StagesPhenotypeProteobacteriaSpecies SpecificityAntifungal AgentsAntifungal defenseCaenorhabditis elegansHolobiontMetaorganismMicrobiomeOchrobactrumPseudomonasSphingomonasStenotrophomonas

Identifiers

PMID27160191
PMCPMC4860760
OpenAlexW2346617299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.