Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27159980›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2016

Radiological findings of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: reports of six cases and review of literature.

Yong-hui Yu, Jing-tao Wu, Jing Ye, Ming-xiang Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Misdiagnosed tuberculous myelitis turned out to be spinal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: a case report.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Synovial sarcoma of the spinal canal and paraspinal muscle and retroperitoneum: a case with extensive calcification.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Article
  20. Retroperitoneal shwannoma: A case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yong-hui YuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, 98# Western Nantong Road, Yangzhou, 225001, China.
Jing-tao WuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, 98# Western Nantong Road, Yangzhou, 225001, China. wujingtaodoctor001@126.com.
Jing YeDepartment of Medical Imaging, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, 98# Western Nantong Road, Yangzhou, 225001, China.
Ming-xiang ChenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, 98# Western Nantong Road, Yangzhou, 225001, China.
Yangzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a kind of rare neurogenic tumor. If associated with neurofibromatosis type 1, MPNST usually has a higher mortality. The aim of the article is to assess the imaging characteristics of MPNST and compare them with those of benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor (BPNST) to characterize this tumor.

methodsClinical and imaging data of six cases with MPNST and 28 cases with BPNST in our institution since 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-three patients have available MR imaging data, and two patients of MPNST also accepted CT scan. One patient accepted CT scan only. Location, size, shape, signal or density, boundary, bone destruction, relation to adjacent nerve, contrast-enhanced features as well as some other signs were assessed and compared with statistical software. Student's t test was used for comparison of continuous variables. Fisher's exact test was used for analysis of nominal variable. A P value ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

resultsDifferences existed between two groups in tumor size ((7.2 ± 3.3)cm in MPNST vs. (3.8 ± 1.4)cm in BPNST), unclear margin (4/6 in MPNST vs. 1/28 in BPNST), eccentricity to the nerve (1/6 in MPNST vs. 21/28 in BPNST), intratumoral lobulation (4/6 in MPNST vs. 2/28 in BPNST), peritumoral edema (3/6 in MPNST vs. 0 in BPNST), and peripheral enhancement (4/6 in MPNST (three of five MR, one CT) vs. 4/28 in BPNST). Bone destruction was observed in one MPNST.

conclusionsMR imaging is a valuable, non-invasive modality for the diagnosis of MPNST. Peripheral enhancement with non-cystic appearance or remarkable heterogeneous enhancement may be useful for differential diagnosis. Other imaging features such as large size (over 5 cm in diameter), ill-defined margin, intratumoral lobulation, peritumoral edema, and adjacent bone destruction are also supportive of MPNST.

Indexed as

FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNerve Sheath NeoplasmsPeripheral Nervous System NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTomography, X-Ray ComputedMR imagingNervous-peripheralTomographyX-ray computer

Identifiers

PMID27159980
PMCPMC4862189
OpenAlexW2347006230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.