Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27159884›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

High-Degree Neurons Feed Cortical Computations.

Nicholas M Timme, Shinya Ito, Maxym Myroshnychenko, Sunny Nigam, Masanori Shimono, Fang-Chin Yeh, Pawel Hottowy, Alan M Litke, John M Beggs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Information-processing dynamics in neural networks of macaque cerebral cortex reflect cognitive state and behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Emergence as the conversion of information: a unifying theory.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicholas M TimmeDepartment of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
Shinya ItoSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
Maxym MyroshnychenkoProgram in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7790-257X
Sunny NigamDepartment of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1559-5556
Masanori ShimonoMGH/HST Athinoula A. Martinos Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Fang-Chin YehDepartment of Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.
Pawel HottowyPhysics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7592-2195
Alan M LitkeSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
John M BeggsDepartment of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent work has shown that functional connectivity among cortical neurons is highly varied, with a small percentage of neurons having many more connections than others. Also, recent theoretical developments now make it possible to quantify how neurons modify information from the connections they receive. Therefore, it is now possible to investigate how information modification, or computation, depends on the number of connections a neuron receives (in-degree) or sends out (out-degree). To do this, we recorded the simultaneous spiking activity of hundreds of neurons in cortico-hippocampal slice cultures using a high-density 512-electrode array. This preparation and recording method combination produced large numbers of neurons recorded at temporal and spatial resolutions that are not currently available in any in vivo recording system. We utilized transfer entropy (a well-established method for detecting linear and nonlinear interactions in time series) and the partial information decomposition (a powerful, recently developed tool for dissecting multivariate information processing into distinct parts) to quantify computation between neurons where information flows converged. We found that computations did not occur equally in all neurons throughout the networks. Surprisingly, neurons that computed large amounts of information tended to receive connections from high out-degree neurons. However, the in-degree of a neuron was not related to the amount of information it computed. To gain insight into these findings, we developed a simple feedforward network model. We found that a degree-modified Hebbian wiring rule best reproduced the pattern of computation and degree correlation results seen in the real data. Interestingly, this rule also maximized signal propagation in the presence of network-wide correlations, suggesting a mechanism by which cortex could deal with common random background input. These are the first results to show that the extent to which a neuron modifies incoming information streams depends on its topological location in the surrounding functional network.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsCerebral CortexComputational BiologyFeedback, PhysiologicalHippocampusInformation TheoryMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMultivariate AnalysisNerve NetNeuronsSynaptic Transmission

Identifiers

PMID27159884
PMCPMC4861348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.