Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27159794›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2016

Resilience in Survivors of Critical Illness in the Context of the Survivors' Experience and Recovery.

Jason H Maley, Isabel Brewster, Iris Mayoral, Renata Siruckova, Sarah Adams, Kelley A McGraw, Angela A Piech, Michael Detsky, Mark E Mikkelsen

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jason H Maley1 Department of Medicine.
Isabel Brewster2 School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, and.
Iris Mayoral2 School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, and.
Renata Siruckova2 School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, and.
Sarah Adams2 School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, and.
Kelley A McGraw3 Medical Intensive Care Unit, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and.
Angela A Piech3 Medical Intensive Care Unit, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and.
Michael Detsky4 Interdivisional Department of Critical Care, University of Toronto, and.
Mark E Mikkelsen1 Department of Medicine.
University of Pennsylvania · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USMount Sinai Hospital · CAPulmonary and Allergy Associates · US

Funding

Sepsis Survivors' Post-Acute Outcomes: Impact of Early Home Health and MD VisitsR01NR016014 · NINR · VISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK · PI BOWLES, KATHRYN HELENE · 2015 to 2025
$4.6M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePost-intensive care syndrome (PICS), defined as new or worsening impairment in cognition, mental health, or physical function after critical illness, is an important development in survivors. Although studies to date have focused on the frequency of these impairments, fundamental questions remain unanswered regarding the survivor experience and the impact of the critical illness event on survivor resilience and recovery.

objectivesTo examine the association between resilience and neuropsychological and physical function and to contextualize these findings within the survivors' recovery experience.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods pilot investigation of resilience among 43 survivors from two medical intensive care units (ICUs) within an academic health-care system. We interviewed survivors to identify barriers to and facilitators of recovery in the ICU, on the medical ward, and at home, using qualitative methods. We used a telephone battery of standardized tests to examine resilience, neuropsychological and physical function, and quality of life. We examined PICS in two ways. First, we identified how frequently survivors were impaired in one or more domains 6-12 months postdischarge. Second, we identified how frequently survivors reported that neuropsychological or physical function was worse. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsResilience was low in 28% of survivors, normal in 63% of survivors, and high in 9% of survivors. Resilience was inversely correlated with self-reported executive dysfunction, symptoms of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder, difficulty with self-care, and pain (P < 0.05). PICS was present in 36 survivors (83.7%; 95% confidence interval, 69.3-93.2%), whereas 23 survivors (53.5%; 95% confidence interval, 37.6-68.8%) reported worsening of neuropsychological or physical function after critical illness. We identified challenges along the recovery path of ICU survivors, finding that physical limitations and functional dependence were the most frequent challenges experienced in the ICU, medical ward, and on return to home. Spiritual and family support facilitated recovery.

conclusionsResilience was inversely correlated with neuropsychological impairment, pain, and difficulty with self-care. PICS was present in most survivors of critical illness, and 54% reported neuropsychological or physical function to be worse, yet resilience was normal or high in most survivors. Survivors experienced many challenges during recovery, while spiritual and family support facilitated recovery.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeResilience, PsychologicalAdultAgedCognitive DysfunctionCritical IllnessFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPhiladelphiaPilot ProjectsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSelf Reportcognitive impairmentcritical carequality of liferesiliencesurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID27159794
PMCPMC5021076
OpenAlexW2345746030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.