ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2016
Engineered bacteria detect spatial profiles in glucose concentration within solid tumor cell masses.
Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leveraging the bacteria for enhanced cancer immunotherapy: from a perspective of synthetic biology.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
- Catabolic rewiring in cancer impacts dietary interventions.Communications biology · 2025Review
- Engineered bacteria: Strategies and applications in cancer immunotherapy.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Synthetic biomolecular condensates enhance translation from a target mRNA in living cells.Nature chemistry · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Probiotics as Novel Therapeutics for Improving Human Health: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Bacterial-Mediated Tumor Therapy: Old Treatment in a New Context.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Recent advances in bacterial therapeutics based on sense and response.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2023Review
- Bacterial immunotherapy: is it a weapon in our arsenal in the fight against cancer?Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Theranostic cells: emerging clinical applications of synthetic biology.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2021Review
- Nanotechnology-Employed Bacteria-Based Delivery Strategy for Enhanced Anticancer Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2021Review
- Homologous Quorum Sensing Regulatory Circuit: A Dual-Input Genetic Controller for Modulating Quorum Sensing-Mediated Protein Expression inACS synthetic biology · 2020Article
- Bacteria-cancer interactions: bacteria-based cancer therapy.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2019Review
- Plasmid-encoded protein attenuates Escherichia coli swimming velocity and cell growth, not reprogrammed regulatory functions.Biotechnology progress · 2019Article
- Tumour-targeting bacteria engineered to fight cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2018Review
- A platform of genetically engineered bacteria as vehicles for localized delivery of therapeutics: Toward applications for Crohn's disease.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2018Article
- Prediction of Necrotic Core and Hypoxic Zone of Multicellular Spheroids in a Microbioreactor with a U-Shaped Barrier.Micromachines · 2018Article
- Advances in bacterial cancer therapies using synthetic biology.Current opinion in systems biology · 2017Article
- Revisiting Seed and Soil: Examining the Primary Tumor and Cancer Cell Foraging in Metastasis.Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2017Review
- Carcinogenesis and therapeutics: the microbiota perspective.Nature microbiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor heterogeneity makes cancer difficult to treat. Many small molecule cancer drugs target rapidly dividing cells on the periphery of tumors but have difficulty in penetrating deep into tumors and are ineffective at treating entire tumors. Targeting both rapidly dividing and slower growing regions of tumors is essential to effectively treat cancer. A cancer drug carrier that penetrates deep into tumors and identifies metabolically activity could supply treatment to those areas based on the local microenvironment. We hypothesized that glucose sensing bacteria could identify sugar gradients in solid tumors. To test this hypothesis, a genetic circuit was designed to trigger expression of a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter through the chemotaxis-osmoporin fusion protein, Trz1, a receptor for sensing glucose and ribose sugars. E. coli equipped with the Trz1-GFP expression system, were administered to an in vitro model of a continuously perfused tumor tissue that mimics systemic delivery and clearance of bacteria through a blood vessel adjacent to a solid tumor. The level of GFP expressed, per bacterium, was time independent and indicated the glucose concentration as a function of penetration depth within the microfluidic tumors. The measured glucose concentration, correlated (P-value = 2.6 × 10(-5) ) with tumor cell viability as a function of depth. Mathematical analysis predicted drug delivery by glucose-sensing bacteria would eliminate a higher percentage of the viable tumor cell population than a systemically administered drug. Glucose-sensing bacteria could deliver cancer therapies with increased drug penetration and nutrient-dependent dosing to continuously treat viable regions of cancer tissue that have a higher prevalence for metastatic dissemination. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016;113: 2474-2484. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.