Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27159639›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2016

A global survey of adverse event following immunization surveillance systems for pregnant women and their infants.

Christine Cassidy, Noni E MacDonald, Audrey Steenbeek, Justin R Ortiz, Patrick L F Zuber, Karina A Top

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The safety of maternal immunization.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine Cassidya School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Professions, Dalhousie University , Halifax , Nova Scotia , Canada.
Noni E MacDonaldb Department of Pediatrics , Dalhousie University , Halifax , Nova Scotia , Canada.
Audrey Steenbeeka School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Professions, Dalhousie University , Halifax , Nova Scotia , Canada.
Justin R Ortizd Initiative for Vaccine Research, World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland.
Patrick L F Zuberd Initiative for Vaccine Research, World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland.
Karina A Topb Department of Pediatrics , Dalhousie University , Halifax , Nova Scotia , Canada.

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U50 CK000431World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strengthening antenatal care as a platform for maternal immunization is a priority of the World Health Organization (WHO). Systematic surveillance for adverse events following immunization (AEFI) in pregnancy is needed to identify vaccine safety events. We sought to identify active and passive AEFI surveillance systems for pregnant women and infants. Representatives from all National Pharmacovigilance Centers and a convenience sample of vaccine safety experts were invited to complete a 14-item online survey in English, French or Spanish. The survey captured maternal immunization policies, and active and passive AEFI surveillance systems for pregnant women and infants in respondents' countries. The analysis was descriptive. We received responses from 51/185 (28%) invited persons from 47/148 (32%) countries representing all WHO regions, and low, middle and high-income countries. Thirty countries had national immunization policies targeting pregnant women. Eleven countries had active surveillance systems to detect serious AEFI in pregnant women and/or their infants, including six low and middle-income countries (LMIC). Thirty-nine countries had passive surveillance systems, including 23 LMIC. These active and passive surveillance programs cover approximately 8% and 56% of the worldwide annual birth cohort, respectively. Data from one active and four passive systems have been published. We identified 50 active and passive AEFI surveillance systems for pregnant women and infants, but few have published their findings. AEFI surveillance appears to be feasible in low and high resource settings. Further expansion of AEFI surveillance for pregnant women and sharing of vaccine safety information will provide additional evidence in support of maternal immunization policies.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsEpidemiological MonitoringDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleGlobal HealthHealth PolicyHumansImmunizationInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyadverse event following immunizationneonatepregnancysurveillancevaccination

Identifiers

PMID27159639
PMCPMC4994761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.