ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2016
Dentoskeletal effects produced by removable palatal crib, bonded spurs, and chincup therapy in growing children with anterior open bite.
Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04075617 (Cessation of Thumb/Finger Sucking Habit in Children Using Electronic Habit Reminder Versus Palatal Crib.Randomized Clinical Pilot Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cessation of Thumb/Finger Sucking Habit in Children Using Electronic Habit Reminder Versus Palatal Crib.Randomized Clinical Pilot Study.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of bonded lingual spurs with low trans palatal arch on developing anterior open bite (a randomized controlled trial).BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Cessation of thumb/finger sucking habit in children using electronic habit reminder versus palatal crib: a randomized clinical pilot study.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Oral health-related quality of life, adaptation/discomfort during open bite treatment with spurs: complementary analysis from a randomized clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Three-dimensional dentoalveolar changes in open bite treatment in mixed dentition, spurs/posterior build-ups versus spurs alone: 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Dental arch changes after anterior open bite treatment in the mixed dentition produced by miniscrew-supported palatal crib vs conventional fixed palatal crib.The Angle orthodontist · 2022Trial
- Dentoalveolar effects produced by different appliances on early treatment of anterior open bite: A randomized clinical trial.The Angle orthodontist · 2018Trial
- Dimensional changes of dental arches produced by fixed and removable palatal cribs: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.The Angle orthodontist · 2017Trial
- Minimally invasive orthodontic management: a paradigm shift in interceptive care. Part II - early management of oral habit-related malocclusions.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2026Review
- Review
- Dentoalveolar changes observed after the use of customized bonded Shark-Tooth-Like Spurs (JAWs) in adult patients with anterior open bite.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2023Article
- A prospective clinical trial of the effects produced by the extrusion arch in the treatment of anterior open bite.Progress in orthodontics · 2020Article
- Orthodontic Treatment Timing and Modalities in Anterior Open Bite: Case Series Study.The open dentistry journal · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the dentoskeletal effects of different anterior open bite treatment modalities in children. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cephalometric study assessed changes resulting from different treatment approaches on 77 growing children with anterior open bite. A control group (n = 30) was used for comparison. Lateral cephalograms were available before treatment and after 12 months. The sample was divided into four groups: removable palatal crib associated with a chincup (G1), bonded spurs associated with a chincup (G2), chincup (G3), and nontreated control (G4). Statistical comparisons among the four groups were performed on T1 and the treatment changes using analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc tests.
resultsNo statistically significant changes in skeletal variables were found among the groups, except for lower anterior face height (LAFH) increase in G1. Overall, effects in all of the treated groups were exclusively dentoalveolar. A larger overbite (OB) increase was observed in G1 and G2 when compared with G3 and G4. The maxillary incisors in G1 showed increased palatal tipping, retrusion, and more vertical dentoalveolar development as well as increased lingual tipping among mandibular incisors. There was less vertical development of maxillary and mandibular molars in G3.
conclusionsA removable palatal crib provided an improvement in OB (97.5%), followed by the bonded spurs (84.5%). Conversely, the chincup-only group did not have positive OB effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.