Trial reportPloS one2016
A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of a Rifapentine plus Moxifloxacin-Based Regimen for Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.
Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00728507 (A Phase II Randomized, Open-label Trial of a Rifapentine Plus Moxifloxacin-Based Regimen for Intensive Phase Treatment of Smear-Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II Randomized, Open-label Trial of a Rifapentine Plus Moxifloxacin-Based Regimen for Intensive Phase Treatment of Smear-Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of high-dose rifamycin regimens for tuberculosis treatment: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment Effect Measures for Culture Conversion Endpoints in Phase IIb Tuberculosis Treatment Trials.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Pooled it
- Dynamics of sputum conversion during effective tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Rifapentine Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Recommendations for Latent Tuberculosis Infection.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Shortened treatment regimens versus the standard regimen for drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Diabetes mellitus comorbidity in patients enrolled in tuberculosis drug efficacy trials around the world: A systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- Four-Month Rifapentine Regimens with or without Moxifloxacin for Tuberculosis.The New England journal of medicine · 2021Trial
- A Moxifloxacin-based Regimen for the Treatment of Recurrent, Drug-sensitive Pulmonary Tuberculosis: An Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020Trial
- Effect of rifampicin and efavirenz on moxifloxacin concentrations when co-administered in patients with drug-susceptible TB.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2017Trial
- Evaluating the efficacy of HRZE-based regimens in a high-burden murine model: a back-translational assessment of rifamycins and moxifloxacin substitutions in tuberculosis treatment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Head and Neck Manifestation of Tuberculosis.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2024Article
- An Overview of Various Rifampicin Analogs againstMedicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)) · 2024Review
- Methods for handling missing data in serially sampled sputum specimens for mycobacterial culture conversion calculation.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Model-Based Efficacy and Toxicity Comparisons of Moxifloxacin for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Fluoroquinolone Efficacy against Tuberculosis Is Driven by Penetration into Lesions and Activity against Resident Bacterial Populations.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019Article
- A Review of Moxifloxacin for the Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Review
- New antituberculous drugs derived from natural products: current perspectives and issues in antituberculous drug development.The Journal of antibiotics · 2017Review
- Animal Models for Tuberculosis in Translational and Precision Medicine.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Review
- Sterilizing Activity of Fully Oral Intermittent Regimens against Mycobacterium Ulcerans Infection in Mice.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016Article
- Tuberculosis treatment.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e TisilogiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe combination of rifapentine and moxifloxacin administered daily with other anti-tuberculosis drugs is highly active in mouse models of tuberculosis chemotherapy. The objective of this phase 2 clinical trial was to determine the bactericidal activity, safety, and tolerability of a regimen comprised of rifapentine, moxifloxacin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide administered daily during the first 8 weeks of pulmonary tuberculosis treatment.
methodsAdults with sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis were randomized to receive either rifapentine (approximately 7.5 mg/kg) plus moxifloxacin (investigational arm), or rifampin (approximately 10 mg/kg) plus ethambutol (control) daily for 8 weeks, along with isoniazid and pyrazinamide. The primary endpoint was sputum culture status at completion of 8 weeks of treatment.
results121 participants (56% of accrual target) were enrolled. At completion of 8 weeks of treatment, negative cultures using Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium occurred in 47/60 (78%) participants in the investigational arm vs. 43/51 (84%, p = 0.47) in the control arm; negative cultures using liquid medium occurred in 37/47 (79%) in the investigational arm vs. 27/41 (66%, p = 0.23) in the control arm. Time to stable culture conversion was shorter for the investigational arm vs. the control arm using liquid culture medium (p = 0.03), but there was no difference using LJ medium. Median rifapentine area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) was 313 mcg*h/mL, similar to recent studies of rifapentine dosed at 450-600 mg daily. Median moxifloxacin AUC0-24 was 28.0 mcg*h/mL, much lower than in trials where rifapentine was given only intermittently with moxifloxacin. The proportion of participants discontinuing assigned treatment for reasons other than microbiological ineligibility was higher in the investigational arm vs. the control arm (11/62 [18%] vs. 3/59 [5%], p = 0.04) although the proportions of grade 3 or higher adverse events were similar (5/62 [8%] in the investigational arm vs. 6/59 [10%, p = 0.76] in the control arm).
conclusionFor intensive phase daily tuberculosis treatment in combination with isoniazid and pyrazinamide, a regimen containing moxifloxacin plus low dose rifapentine was at least as bactericidal as the control regimen containing ethambutol plus standard dose rifampin.
trial registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00728507.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.