Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27159373›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2016

Systematic comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 and RNAi screens for essential genes.

David W Morgens, Richard M Deans, Amy Li, Michael C Bassik

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 253 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
253citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
29.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

253 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 429 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Localized heme sensing through a ternary molecular glue.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

193 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David W MorgensDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Richard M DeansDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Amy LiDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Michael C BassikDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN GENOME SCIENCET32HG000044 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL P. SNYDER · 1995 to 2026
$32.2M
Accelerating drug development and repurposing using systematic genetic interactioDP2HD084069 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BASSIK, MICHAEL C · 2014 to 2014
$2.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000044NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD084069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the ability of short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and CRISPR/Cas9 screens to identify essential genes in the human chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line K562. We found that the precision of the two libraries in detecting essential genes was similar and that combining data from both screens improved performance. Notably, results from the two screens showed little correlation, which can be partially explained by the identification of distinct essential biological processes with each technology.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsGenes, EssentialGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Small InterferingSensitivity and SpecificityCRISPR-Associated ProteinsRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID27159373
PMCPMC4900911
OpenAlexW2346643793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.