Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27159174›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2016

Toxicities of busulfan/melphalan versus carboplatin/etoposide/melphalan for high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue for high-risk neuroblastoma.

A V Desai, M B Heneghan, Y Li, N J Bunin, S A Grupp, R Bagatell, A E Seif

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Impact ofChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Pediatric high risk neuroblastoma with autologous stem cell transplant - 20 years of experience.International journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine · 2021
    Article
  13. A safety and feasibility trial ofPediatric blood & cancer · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Upfront consolidation treatment withPediatric investigation · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A V DesaiDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
M B HeneghanDepartment of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Y LiDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
N J BuninDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
S A GruppDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
R BagatellDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
A E SeifDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal autologous stem cell rescue (HDC-SCR) regimen for children with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL) is not defined. Carboplatin/etoposide/melphalan (CEM) is the current US standard; however, European data suggest busulfan/melphalan (Bu/Mel) may have less toxicity. Published data regarding toxicities associated with CEM and Bu/Mel are limited. We conducted a single-institution retrospective cohort study of children with HR-NBL who received CEM or Bu/Mel preparative regimens. Toxicity data were analyzed using χ(2) or Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon two-sample or log-rank tests. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) was observed in 7/44 CEM (15.9%) and 5/21 (24%) Bu/Mel patients (P=0.50). Median time to SOS was longer following Bu/Mel than CEM (20 versus 9 days, P=0.02). Pulmonary hypertension (PHTN) was observed in ~20% of children after Bu/Mel and none after CEM (P=0.01). CEM patients had more nephrotoxicity (P=0.001), packed red blood cell (P=0.02) and platelet transfusions (P=0.008), and days on maximum pain support (P=0.0007). Time to engraftment, length of stay, documented infection rates and HDC-SCR-related mortality were similar. Nephrotoxicity and resource utilization associated with cytopenias and mucositis were greater after CEM. Pulmonary toxicities were more severe after Bu/Mel, and increased vigilance for PHTN may be warranted, particularly in children with hypoxemia out of proportion to respiratory distress.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBusulfanCarboplatinChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEtoposideFemaleHepatic Veno-Occlusive DiseaseHumansHypertension, PulmonaryInfantKidney DiseasesMaleMelphalanBusulfanCarboplatinEtoposideMelphalanMyeloablative Agonists

Identifiers

PMID27159174
OpenAlexW2346075579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.