Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27159166›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Comparative Immunogenicity of HIV-1 gp140 Vaccine Delivered by Parenteral, and Mucosal Routes in Female Volunteers; MUCOVAC2, A Randomized Two Centre Study.

Catherine A Cosgrove, Charles J Lacey, Alethea V Cope, Angela Bartolf, Georgina Morris, Celine Yan, Susan Baden, Tom Cole, Darrick Carter, Elizabeth Brodnicki and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Antigen Delivery Systems: Past, Present, and Future.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Vaginal delivery of vaccines.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Protein and Glycan Mimicry in HIV Vaccine Design.Journal of molecular biology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Synthetic biology approach for the development of conditionally replicating HIV-1 vaccine.Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire : 1986) · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Catherine A CosgroveCentre for Infection, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Charles J LaceyHull York Medical School & Centre for Immunology and Infection, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Alethea V CopeMucosal Infection & Immunity Group, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Angela BartolfCentre for Infection, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Georgina MorrisHull York Medical School & Centre for Immunology and Infection, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Celine YanMucosal Infection & Immunity Group, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Susan BadenCentre for Infection, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Tom ColeMucosal Infection & Immunity Group, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Darrick CarterInfectious Disease Research Institute (IDRI), Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Elizabeth BrodnickiMedical Research Council, Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Xiaoying ShenDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Sarah JosephMedical Research Council, Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen C DeRosaVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Lili PengStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Xuesong YuStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Guido FerrariDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Mike SeamanCAVD Neutralizing Antibody Laboratory, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
David C MontefioriDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Nicole FrahmVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Georgia D TomarasDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Wolfgang StöhrMedical Research Council, Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sheena McCormackMedical Research Council, Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Robin J ShattockMucosal Infection & Immunity Group, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Duke Medical Center · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USImperial College London · GBSt George's, University of London · GBMedical Research Council · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of York · GBHarvard University · USInfectious Disease Research Institute · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U122861400Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/23Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefining optimal routes for induction of mucosal immunity represents an important research priority for the HIV-1 vaccine field. In particular, it remains unclear whether mucosal routes of immunization can improve mucosal immune responses.

methodsIn this randomized two center phase I clinical trial we evaluated the systemic and mucosal immune response to a candidate HIV-1 Clade C CN54gp140 envelope glycoprotein vaccine administered by intramuscular (IM), intranasal (IN) and intravaginal (IVAG) routes of administration in HIV negative female volunteers. IM immunizations were co-administered with Glucopyranosyl Lipid Adjuvant (GLA), IN immunizations with 0.5% chitosan and IVAG immunizations were administered in an aqueous gel.

resultsThree IM immunizations of CN54 gp140 at either 20 or 100 μg elicited significantly greater systemic and mucosal antibodies than either IN or IVAG immunizations. Following additional intramuscular boosting we observed an anamnestic antibody response in nasally primed subjects. Modest neutralizing responses were detected against closely matched tier 1 clade C virus in the IM groups. Interestingly, the strongest CD4 T-cell responses were detected after IN and not IM immunization.

conclusionsThese data show that parenteral immunization elicits systemic and mucosal antibodies in women. Interestingly IN immunization was an effective prime for IM boost, while IVAG administration had no detectable impact on systemic or mucosal responses despite IM priming. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2010-019103-27 and the UK Clinical Research Network (UKCRN) Number 11679.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAdolescentAdultAIDS Vaccinesenv Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusFemaleHIV AntibodiesHumansImmunity, CellularImmunoglobulin GInjections, IntramuscularMiddle AgedMucous MembraneVaginaYoung AdultAIDS Vaccinesenv Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virusgp140 envelope protein, Human immunodeficiency virus 1HIV AntibodiesImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID27159166
PMCPMC4861263
OpenAlexW2347110317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.