Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27159157›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Enhancing the Ethical Conduct of HIV Research with Migrant Sex Workers: Human Rights, Policy, and Social Contextual Influences.

Shira M Goldenberg, Kimberly C Brouwer, Teresita Rocha Jimenez, Sonia Morales Miranda, Monica Rivera Mindt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shira M GoldenbergFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1633-9749
Kimberly C BrouwerDivision of Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, United States of America.
Teresita Rocha JimenezDivision of Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0507, United States of America.
Sonia Morales MirandaHIV Unit, Universidad del Valle, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Monica Rivera MindtHIV Prevention Research Ethics Institute, Fordham University, 441 E. Fordham Road, Bronx, NY, 10458, United States of America.

Funding

Training Program in HIV Prevention Research EthicsR25DA031608 · NIDA · FORDHAM UNIVERSITY · PI FISHER, CELIA B · 2011 to 2025
$4.9M
Crossing Borders: HIV and Substance use at the Gateway to North AmericaR01DA029899 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BROUWER, KIMBERLY C · 2010 to 2014
$2.3M
Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchNIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029899NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA031608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigrant sex workers are often highly marginalized and disproportionately experience health and social inequities, including high prevalence of HIV, sexually transmitted infections, and human rights violations. In recent years, research involving migrant sex workers has increased, yet many knowledge gaps remain regarding how best to protect research participant rights and welfare. Our objective was to identify key challenges and opportunities related to the responsible conduct of HIV research with migrant sex workers.

methodsFocus groups and interviews conducted with 33 female sex workers ≥18 years old at the Guatemala-Mexico border from June 2013-February 2014 were analyzed. Participants were recruited through community outreach by a local HIV prevention organization to sex work establishments such as bars, hotels, street corners, and truck stops.

resultsKey themes influencing research engagement for migrant sex workers included researcher mistrust and fear related to research participation, rooted in the social isolation frequently faced by recent migrants; intersecting concerns related to immigration status, fear of criminalization, and compliance with sex work regulations; and perceived benefits and risks of HIV/STI testing for migrants (e.g., immigration implications, stigma) represent potential barriers and opportunities for the responsible conduct of research involving migrant sex workers.

conclusionsResults highlight the intersection between the human rights vulnerabilities of migrant sex workers and barriers to research participation, including social isolation of migrants and policy/legal barriers related to immigration and sex work. Findings illustrate the need for researchers to develop population-tailored procedures to address fears related to immigration and criminalization, and to reinforce positive and non-stigmatizing relationships with migrant sex workers. Community-led efforts to reduce stigma and foster community organization and supports for migrant sex workers are recommended, as are broader policy shifts that move away from punitive legal approaches towards approaches that safeguard and prioritize the human rights of migrant sex workers.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHuman RightsSex WorkSocial BehaviorTransients and MigrantsAdultFocus GroupsHIV InfectionsHumansMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27159157
PMCPMC4861265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.