Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27158822›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2016

Genome-Wide Analysis Identifies Germ-Line Risk Factors Associated with Canine Mammary Tumours.

Malin Melin, Patricio Rivera, Maja Arendt, Ingegerd Elvers, Eva Murén, Ulla Gustafson, Mike Starkey, Kaja Sverdrup Borge, Frode Lingaas, Jens Häggström and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A scan for genes associated with cancer mortality and longevity in pedigree dog breeds.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2020
    Article
  14. Somatic Mutation ofCancers · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Malin MelinScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Patricio RiveraEvidensia Södra Djursjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2542-5905
Maja ArendtScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ingegerd ElversScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6604-0369
Eva MurénScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ulla GustafsonDepartment of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mike StarkeyAnimal Health Trust, Newmarket, United Kingdom.
Kaja Sverdrup BorgeDepartment of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Frode LingaasDepartment of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Jens HäggströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3402-023X
Sara SaellströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Henrik RönnbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kerstin Lindblad-TohScience for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUppsala University · SEBroad Institute · USNorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOAnimal Health Trust · GBDanderyds sjukhus · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canine mammary tumours (CMT) are the most common neoplasia in unspayed female dogs. CMTs are suitable naturally occurring models for human breast cancer and share many characteristics, indicating that the genetic causes could also be shared. We have performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in English Springer Spaniel dogs and identified a genome-wide significant locus on chromosome 11 (praw = 5.6x10-7, pperm = 0.019). The most associated haplotype spans a 446 kb region overlapping the CDK5RAP2 gene. The CDK5RAP2 protein has a function in cell cycle regulation and could potentially have an impact on response to chemotherapy treatment. Two additional loci, both on chromosome 27, were nominally associated (praw = 1.97x10-5 and praw = 8.30x10-6). The three loci explain 28.1±10.0% of the phenotypic variation seen in the cohort, whereas the top ten associated regions account for 38.2±10.8% of the risk. Furthermore, the ten GWAS loci and regions with reduced genetic variability are significantly enriched for snoRNAs and tumour-associated antigen genes, suggesting a role for these genes in CMT development. We have identified several candidate genes associated with canine mammary tumours, including CDK5RAP2. Our findings enable further comparative studies to investigate the genes and pathways in human breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Cycle ProteinsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleHaplotypesHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMammary Neoplasms, AnimalNerve Tissue ProteinsRNA, Small NucleolarCDK5RAP2 protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsRNA, Small Nucleolar

Identifiers

PMID27158822
PMCPMC4861258
OpenAlexW2346871838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.